46 Bewertungen
The movie starts bad from the first scene. That talk with his mother via telephone is bad. Those scenes change and you hear the other one really bad, in other movie youll hear him clean no matter if the scene turns to the listener
When he is with his wife, and run to the basement to grab something to show her ... in 15 seconds she is already asleep. I mean you need to be amazingly tired to fall asleep that fast.
Next scene when he looks at those photos ... after that changes to morning scene, and he goes outside to the car, and he keep holding and viewing that photo.
The acting is bad ... lines are the worst, When I first watched the movie had 5 / 10 score here.
Nothing horror in this movie, and HUSH movie was made with 1 million USD and is 10000 better than this garbage.
Probably actors played on this movie for food ... it was very bad.
- ZeroCoolRO
- 8. Apr. 2019
- Permalink
Good(ish) premise.. Effects are ok and musical score was on the nose, however the acting and script are just terrible.. most lineS feel unnatural and forced and every scene and behaviours of the characters are not plausible in the slightest. The protagonists disregard for his wife's safety and his willingness to pull someone out of a psychiatric hospital... his whole performance is bad and not believable. Supporting actors are awful as well, mother and wife, just shocking. Build up is poor and before you know it it's just another exorcism movie.. just a bad one. Don't waste your time.
Actress who played Karen was good and only thing that kept me engaged
- trbarnes-37166
- 17. Apr. 2020
- Permalink
Because maybe she was possessed or sued by the spirit of Anastasia Beaverhausen.
Don't bother watching this unoriginal hot mess of a movie.
Don't bother watching this unoriginal hot mess of a movie.
Really poor acting, the wife is sooo bad, the husband is a wetfish, the mother reminds me of a mother from one of those old films where she controls her kids with religion and shouting at nothing, just crazy, and the other 2 main characters, well one played out to be what she is advertised as but at some old silly fair/circus in a little caravan who managed to pull something off that a so called expert failed to do years ago with her and help from other experts. Yet she manages to get something to work with just herself and the wetfish, and the only one who played an ok part was the sister, and thats because she doesn't really say or do anything, her makeup is quite good too, but as soon as it gets near the end and she has to do a little acting, its just as bad as the rest.
You don't have to worry about spoilers, you know exactly what is going to happen and it does so there you don't need to watch it now lol. I wouldn't bother.
- deetrueman
- 15. Aug. 2018
- Permalink
Could have been a pretty cool film but the acting left a lot to be desired. The acting and crappy "american" accents were too distracting. Why have an English main character and an American main actor then have other English cast and make them do American accents when they clearly can't . It didn't even make sense where this was supposed to be filmed. American people, American car but an English house. The plot could have made a great film. All in all very disappointing.
- mrshannahhaines
- 17. Aug. 2018
- Permalink
Low budget, easily predictable film. Nothing special. You pretty much know from the beginning how it's going to end, and it does. Worth watching once, but not twice.
The wife looks like a team America puppet but with less acting skills, the husband is a sock puppet, the script must have been written on a fag packet during some sort of crisis. Another crap horror from Netflix.
- gurumaggie
- 5. Sept. 2021
- Permalink
- bacaladito
- 11. Aug. 2018
- Permalink
So... usually, if there is a trailer available to watch for a B movie, then I watch it to see where on the B movie scale it's gonna land. Because honestly, there's some really awesome B movies out there, and there's some real stinkers. This one, falls on the latter.
Before I go into that let me explain my title. While I was watching the trailer they were putting little review snippets from critics about how amazing this movie is. The first one says, and I quote, "Gives Blumhouse A Run For Their Money" Alan Bryce, Darkside. Now for those of you who aren't familiar with Blumhouse, they are currently by far the number one best horror/thriller movie makers right now. Example, they made the new Halloween movie, they also made "Get Out" and "Ma" and many, many other well known and money making horror movies as of late.
That being said, Allan Bryce must have no soul and will say whatever you want him to say in a review for the right $$$, or...the guy has not one functioning brain cell left. Next, I will never trust ANYTHING Darkside says about a movie from here on out, you shouldn't either. This movie isn't even in the same arena as Blumhouse movies, hell not even the same sport!
So if you've read this far, by now you must've figured out what I think of this movie, if the 1 star wasn't a giveaway to begin with lol. Bad acting, bad effects, bad story, bad delivery, if it's bad, it's in this movie. Skip it and go find yourself an awesome Blumhouse movie to watch.
Till next time, cheers
Before I go into that let me explain my title. While I was watching the trailer they were putting little review snippets from critics about how amazing this movie is. The first one says, and I quote, "Gives Blumhouse A Run For Their Money" Alan Bryce, Darkside. Now for those of you who aren't familiar with Blumhouse, they are currently by far the number one best horror/thriller movie makers right now. Example, they made the new Halloween movie, they also made "Get Out" and "Ma" and many, many other well known and money making horror movies as of late.
That being said, Allan Bryce must have no soul and will say whatever you want him to say in a review for the right $$$, or...the guy has not one functioning brain cell left. Next, I will never trust ANYTHING Darkside says about a movie from here on out, you shouldn't either. This movie isn't even in the same arena as Blumhouse movies, hell not even the same sport!
So if you've read this far, by now you must've figured out what I think of this movie, if the 1 star wasn't a giveaway to begin with lol. Bad acting, bad effects, bad story, bad delivery, if it's bad, it's in this movie. Skip it and go find yourself an awesome Blumhouse movie to watch.
Till next time, cheers
Why, when you have a British directer and totally UK cast do you make everyone speak in very bad American accents? - the house and brief glimpses of scenery are also British - did the budget come from Americans? Did they hope for big sales in the US? The whole thing turned out to be annoying with all the shouting in fake accents and I couldn't wait for it to end - if it had been set in Britain with the actors using their normal accents then it could have been a solid 7/10 but this gets a 4 from me - we make pretty good horror over here if we are allowed to be ourselves and this is the 2nd Brit film I've seen today with awful forced American accents - the other being the very average Patient Zero so I'm probably a bit tired of it all - Rule Britannia!
- davejessop-1
- 21. Aug. 2018
- Permalink
First this movie deserves actually a 6/10 or 7/10, I gave it 10 just cause the general score is too low.
This said, the production is super cheap, looks like a movie school project.
However, if hollywood remade this same exact script, it would be a pretty catchy horror movie with a cool ending. Considering the low budget, I wasnt disappointed one bit after watching it. I have seen faaaaaaaar worse movies which were much better rated so give it a chance.
This said, the production is super cheap, looks like a movie school project.
However, if hollywood remade this same exact script, it would be a pretty catchy horror movie with a cool ending. Considering the low budget, I wasnt disappointed one bit after watching it. I have seen faaaaaaaar worse movies which were much better rated so give it a chance.
At first I almost didn't want to watch this because it seemed low budget. Then I became REALLY engrossed in the story. But the ending killed it for me; WAY too predictable. Just felt like the writer got lazy and took the easy way out smh
- chinara_lucas
- 20. Aug. 2019
- Permalink
- adamafrixal
- 27. Aug. 2018
- Permalink
The premise is quite good but the execution is poor.
None of the actors can actually act. This may be due to the script with is poorly written and even more poorly dramatised.
I found nothing redeeming in this film at all.
None of the actors can actually act. This may be due to the script with is poorly written and even more poorly dramatised.
I found nothing redeeming in this film at all.
- kevincraigmagic
- 31. März 2020
- Permalink
- scarlettimogen
- 8. Sept. 2021
- Permalink
One of the worst films I've seen in 60 years. They can't act. I sincerely hope Rula Lenska retired after THIS! You see the next plotline 10 minutes befor it arrives. Everything is AMATEUR. It doesn't deserve even 1 star.
- patherwill
- 28. Okt. 2021
- Permalink
- nogodnomasters
- 21. Aug. 2018
- Permalink
I guess low budgets do have their downfall. This movie was bad. Predictable, boring. A real waste of time. 2/10
- wandernn1-81-683274
- 19. Jan. 2021
- Permalink
Guess all the reviewers who watched this movie got it right. I gave it 3 stars low rating. Too many films on that genre as it is. Just a time filler really. Peace out from jacey.
- jeffreyc-32567
- 1. Sept. 2019
- Permalink
I registered on purpose just to be able to write that I have never seen ANYTHING worse than this.
If anything, the directors, writers and actors have to be possessed themselves because nobody can create something this bad when mentally sane.
Worst acting I have ever seen. And the script? Wow. I can't even choose what is worse because everything literally sucks.
If anything, the directors, writers and actors have to be possessed themselves because nobody can create something this bad when mentally sane.
Worst acting I have ever seen. And the script? Wow. I can't even choose what is worse because everything literally sucks.
- davidduartemodesto
- 20. Okt. 2021
- Permalink
A couple discover Kirlian Photography apparatus in their new house. Intrigued by the concept of photographing peoples' Auras they unwittingly release an ancient evil. Only the local psychic can help and she knows far more than she reveals.
- szabopatrik-19659
- 24. Okt. 2021
- Permalink
Let's be reasonable. This is a low budget movie. Its not spectacular, its not gory, its not over the top, for me it wasn't particular thrilling. However it was an interesting watch. You can see that the cast and crew actually genuinely cared about what they were making. Yes the special effects leave a lot to be desired but at least they weren't ridiculous. Overall this is a low budget b-grade movie that has been put together quite well.
So I watched the first 20 min. It's not only a cliche, it's a terrible rip-off from every other serious exorcisme movie. The difference comparing to those, bad actors, bad scenery and lower then low budget. It's not even funny.
- missveramuil
- 6. Okt. 2021
- Permalink
Horrible acting, especially Janine Nerissa.
Predictable, poorly filmed, missing storylines, no scares, bad special effects, and much more...a waste of time.
Predictable, poorly filmed, missing storylines, no scares, bad special effects, and much more...a waste of time.
- onesweetday
- 14. Feb. 2022
- Permalink
I was waiting for that massive explosion of haunting and mental torment (the poster is much more scarier) ... It didn't happen, BUT only one thing that made this movie interesting, was the ending (so now I'm hoping there'll be an Aura 2 which I think will be more explosive and scarier than hereditary) ... If you are into seriously minimal entertainment of the paranormal, then yeah, definitely worth the watch
- maxim-93886
- 5. Okt. 2018
- Permalink