[go: up one dir, main page]

    Kalender veröffentlichenDie Top 250 FilmeDie beliebtesten FilmeFilme nach Genre durchsuchenBeste KinokasseSpielzeiten und TicketsNachrichten aus dem FilmFilm im Rampenlicht Indiens
    Was läuft im Fernsehen und was kann ich streamen?Die Top 250 TV-SerienBeliebteste TV-SerienSerien nach Genre durchsuchenNachrichten im Fernsehen
    Was gibt es zu sehenAktuelle TrailerIMDb OriginalsIMDb-AuswahlIMDb SpotlightLeitfaden für FamilienunterhaltungIMDb-Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAlle Ereignisse
    Heute geborenDie beliebtesten PromisPromi-News
    HilfecenterBereich für BeitragendeUmfragen
Für Branchenprofis
  • Sprache
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Anmelden
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
App verwenden
Zurück
  • Besetzung und Crew-Mitglieder
  • Benutzerrezensionen
  • Wissenswertes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro
Wendy Crewson, Angela Griffin, and Shenae Grimes-Beech in The Detail (2018)

Benutzerrezensionen

The Detail

33 Bewertungen
5/10

Will Give it a Chance

This is totally a remake of the UK's Scott and Bailey - I recognized that in the first 5 minutes (and stopped to write this). I will give it a chance; I'm interested to see how well Angela Griffin does, I used to watch her on Coronation Street, and Wendy Crewson is always good. I've got to say though, I love the original so much, especially Amelia Bullmore, and my heart sank when I realized what was going on. (However, Scott and Bailey's creator Sally Wainwright is attached, so perhaps there's hope yet.) Go watch Scott and Bailey!
  • pgdoyle-78691
  • 25. März 2018
  • Permalink
7/10

credit the Original

I loved Scott and Bailey and hope to love this remake. But I was surprised not to see any references to the original until I saw a review here. I wish you well but please credit the original.
  • yo-22657
  • 27. März 2018
  • Permalink
7/10

So good to see Angela Griffin

You will always be Fiona. even though I'm not watching Corrie any more. Enjoyed seeing your still playing a strong woman role Would enjoy seeing more of your charactor on detail. a very old fan of your work.
  • joprkmn
  • 16. Apr. 2018
  • Permalink
7/10

Not anywhere as bad as everyone else says

I don't mind this show at all. Some bits of humour, some crime, some drama. My wife and I are actually enjoying watching it.
  • billyprefect
  • 28. Mai 2018
  • Permalink
3/10

Poor writing, bad acting.

So here we have yet another police procedural TV show, only this time, in the hour this episode lasts, 30 minutes is 3 women who's characters are unconvincing and acting too aloof dealing with their personal menopausal relationship issues, and the other 30 mins is trying to convince us they are doing police work. Seriously, who comes up with this stuff and who pays to produce this hot mess? Bring back Motive. A generous 3/10 from me - will re-evaluate after attempting to sit through a few more episodes.
  • Top_Dawg_Critic
  • 25. März 2018
  • Permalink
7/10

Okay

I quite liked it Angela's accent was good. I preferred it to the English version.
  • gemmakmp
  • 6. Nov. 2018
  • Permalink
4/10

Scott & Bailey remake minus the talent

A middling Canadian remake of UK's Scott & Bailey minus the charismatic actors and strong writing. The original's creator - the brilliant Sally Wainwright - has a purely contractual executive producer credit and a few of her scripts are given downgraded re-writes, but it's the terrible casting that really hurts this new production. Wendy Crewson - in an undeveloped supporting role as police captain - is fine, as is David Cubitt, but the two leads are absolutely forgettable, even if they are under-served by the show's writing staff. (Yes, the mostly female writing staff is just as hacky as any mostly/all-male writing staff.)
  • thedunns-11463
  • 23. Apr. 2018
  • Permalink
10/10

Great new show

This show gets better every week. Give it a chance. Its a remake of Scott and Bailey, but it's starting to move away from the original and find its own voice.
  • blairdolson-2
  • 17. Apr. 2018
  • Permalink

Remake?

Seems this is a pure remake of The Division https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0272376/?ref_=nm_flmg_act_13

which ran four seasons. Good series then, but that was then, so no good reason to try rematching it in a remake.
  • JusMe2
  • 31. März 2018
  • Permalink
7/10

Some harsh reviews here

I get why folk want to compare this with S&B but I've just watched finished watching the whole series and I think this holds its weight on its own merits. It's not a revolutionary recipe but neither is bakewell tart & I'm never going to stop loving bakewell tart, even if it reminds me of another bakewell tart!
  • schrodingers-woofer
  • 29. Dez. 2018
  • Permalink
4/10

remake of UK series Scott & Bailey

That's a remake of UK series Scott & Bailey and as almost every remake ever made it's not... let's put it that way... very good.
  • merlatta
  • 30. März 2018
  • Permalink
8/10

KEEP SHOW GOING

LOVE THE SHOW

PLEASE KEEP SERIES GOING

Love women detective shows
  • dadsgirlnotouch
  • 3. Sept. 2018
  • Permalink
1/10

so disappointed!!!!

I loved Rookie Blue and Saving Hope so was set to love this too. I also loved Scott & Bailey and was shocked to see such a poor attempt at a rip off, even some of the dialogue was an exact copy but without the character build up and good plot line. What a disappointment.
  • rosalindparker
  • 27. März 2018
  • Permalink
3/10

The writing needs to improve.

Update Apr 22/2018: Sorry but I had to downgrade my rating from 5 stars down to 3. The reason being that the writing has gotten worse with each episode instead of better.

Being a fan of Saving Hope & Rookie Blue, I was really looking forward to this series. But sadly, as is the case with most new shows these days, the writing is terrible. The main cast is quite good but a better job needs to be done selecting the extras & secondary actors. I don't think this show will last long unless these shortcomings are fixed soon!
  • blownwideopen
  • 3. Apr. 2018
  • Permalink
4/10

What's with these women who focus more on their bad relationships with men than on their jobs?

Why would these so called liberated female actresses allow themselves to be portrayed as female police detectives who can't get over the rotten men in their lives? This premiere episode focused on not one (1), not two (2), but three (3) women who were experiencing trouble in their relationship with men.

The main gist of this episode is surrounding a woman who was murdered and her husband is the prime suspect. Now this prime suspect husband happens to be having an extra marital affair with a nurse who represents the third women in this trilogy of women who pick the wrong men to get involved with.

I thought this was supposed to be a crime show not an afternoon soap opera?

I think I will stick to watching re-runs of Rookie Blue and Major Crimes.

The Detail rates a low 4 out of 10 on my rating list.
  • Ed-Shullivan
  • 27. März 2018
  • Permalink
10/10

I love this, you have to watch to the end to appreciate it

Really good, watch to the end and you will be on the edge of the seat!!!
  • magsno
  • 5. Jan. 2019
  • Permalink
2/10

Couldn't go thorugh the first ep.

The acting is quite bad. The filming, the angles the grading - it all reminds me of and old soap from the 90s. And it's the worst attempt at a female centric show that I've ever seen. Not sure where they found the script writers..
  • charlotte-s-lindberg
  • 23. Apr. 2018
  • Permalink
10/10

Truely great

I like how they maid each character expectacularly different and interesting with a wonderful back history. It has a dark story but at the same time funny sometimes. Well played thank you
  • dchchaman
  • 27. Mai 2018
  • Permalink
4/10

So disappointing

I was so hoping this would be good unfortunately they threw away everything that made the British series enjoyable. One, the actresses are too good looking. It set in rich Toronto not the grinding poverty of let's say downtown Hamilton. The lead is very weak and has no range. It remind me of a line from the show. MADE IN CANADA. "Our third rate stuff, is second to none.
  • abwetman-1-817328
  • 10. Apr. 2018
  • Permalink
2/10

Wanted to like this Canadian made series

I was looking forward to this new Canadian series but sadly it fails on all fronts. The story lines are a sad re-hash of the excellent British series "Scott and Bailey". Surely there must be some Canadian writers with an ORIGINAL idea. The acting is unconvincing. Better to watch Scott and Bailey again than to waste your time on this lack luster attempt.
  • sharonfraser
  • 24. Apr. 2018
  • Permalink
3/10

Unlikeable Characters

  • annmoore
  • 5. Juli 2018
  • Permalink
10/10

Great adaptation of a great British series

Looking forward to seeing how this progresses and changes from the original. So far I think it's an entertaining adaptation. Brit crime with a canadian twist. Loved it.
  • johnwallacetheking
  • 31. März 2018
  • Permalink
4/10

Plagiarism of Scott & Bailey

The characters and the stories totally plagiarise the british show Scott & Bailey... without any invention or originality... sad ! But I appreciate the two principal actresses, especialy Angela Griffin (I loved her in Lewis, years ago). It's not their fault if the show is a pale duplicate of a great serie.
  • cdartis
  • 10. Apr. 2018
  • Permalink
8/10

Great cast but missing "details"

Ok so the show is called the Details, hence i expected more details, maybe from the actors and their life style. I want to know more about Fiona, her divorce and is she a lesbian idk NEED MORE DETAILS. Over all i think the show is good and i like it so far.
  • safimiguel
  • 13. Mai 2018
  • Permalink
1/10

Here We Go Again

I agree with Harrison, once again as with too many, poor writing, poor acting, superficial, unconvincing. Yeah, who comes up with this stuff? I was finished with it after two episodes. I was totally aware of being on the set, watching the actors, seeing the cameras and the lighting and all that was going on. That's always a clue for me. There are brilliant series out there, but from what I see they are few, those that you can drop into fully, and be caught in the story so much so you forget that it's not a real story. Now that's true creative - that's entertainment! Fortunately it's still around, here and there. I gave this show a 1, only because I couldn't find a 0.
  • emelinemiller
  • 4. Mai 2018
  • Permalink

Mehr von diesem Titel

Mehr entdecken

Zuletzt angesehen

Bitte aktiviere Browser-Cookies, um diese Funktion nutzen zu können. Weitere Informationen
Hol dir die IMDb-App
Melde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr InhalteMelde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr Inhalte
Folge IMDb in den sozialen Netzwerken
Hol dir die IMDb-App
Für Android und iOS
Hol dir die IMDb-App
  • Hilfe
  • Inhaltsverzeichnis
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • IMDb-Daten lizenzieren
  • Pressezimmer
  • Werbung
  • Jobs
  • Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen
  • Datenschutzrichtlinie
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, ein Amazon-Unternehmen

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.