32 Bewertungen
Have you ever been to the movie theater and liked the film, but some idiots in the audience kinda spoiled everything? Because THE BELIEVER is a bit like that.
In general, I'd say that the premise and the twist aren't bad at all, the execution is solid and the pacing is good - not bad for a low-budget flick like this. But there are aspects that do their best to spoil the whole thing.
First, there is Sophie Kargman. While she does an alright job at being annoying and creepy, her mumbling delivery constantly drags you out of the movie, trying to understand what she's actually saying. It doesn't help that they apparently had no sound engineer on set, since almost all the dialogue sounds like a camera mic through too much denoiser. Honestly, the denoising is so bad that it swallows whole syllables at times. The dialogue editors even made a very audible mistake in the online video of Billy Zane giving a talk. Pretty amateurish, to be honest.
Then, there are incredibly stupid lines like "Logic is the guardian of faith" and similar pseudo-philosophical deepities. Actually, the first ten minutes were full of irrational babbling like that, making me think about aborting prematurely. Yes, pun intended.
But no, I pulled through, and once the film picks up some speed, it fares pretty well. And even if the jump scares fell flat for the most part, I still thought that at least the third act was quite compelling.
All in all, THE BELIEVER is a bit of a slow burner with a lot of a lot of pointless and stupid gum flapping in the beginning. The distracting dialogue issues are hurting the film a lot, but if you are a patient and yearning lover of the supernatural, you might find some enjoyment here.
In general, I'd say that the premise and the twist aren't bad at all, the execution is solid and the pacing is good - not bad for a low-budget flick like this. But there are aspects that do their best to spoil the whole thing.
First, there is Sophie Kargman. While she does an alright job at being annoying and creepy, her mumbling delivery constantly drags you out of the movie, trying to understand what she's actually saying. It doesn't help that they apparently had no sound engineer on set, since almost all the dialogue sounds like a camera mic through too much denoiser. Honestly, the denoising is so bad that it swallows whole syllables at times. The dialogue editors even made a very audible mistake in the online video of Billy Zane giving a talk. Pretty amateurish, to be honest.
Then, there are incredibly stupid lines like "Logic is the guardian of faith" and similar pseudo-philosophical deepities. Actually, the first ten minutes were full of irrational babbling like that, making me think about aborting prematurely. Yes, pun intended.
But no, I pulled through, and once the film picks up some speed, it fares pretty well. And even if the jump scares fell flat for the most part, I still thought that at least the third act was quite compelling.
All in all, THE BELIEVER is a bit of a slow burner with a lot of a lot of pointless and stupid gum flapping in the beginning. The distracting dialogue issues are hurting the film a lot, but if you are a patient and yearning lover of the supernatural, you might find some enjoyment here.
- IMDbKeepsDeletingMyReviews
- 1. Apr. 2021
- Permalink
Key elements of the plot are lost in the mumbling, unintelligible dialogue by "Sophie".
- divadoodledoo
- 8. Aug. 2021
- Permalink
It was a good movie but very confusing at times.
Definitely watchable and not bad.
Definitely watchable and not bad.
- thegravitroneffect
- 18. Apr. 2021
- Permalink
- markneil-35448
- 4. Aug. 2021
- Permalink
Well. There goes 90 minutes of my life, that I will never get back. Bad acting, horrible pacing and a virtually unfollowable plot. Do not waste your time. I would have rather watched 90 minutes of the purple dinosaur Barney than this movie. Ugh.
- robertjandrew
- 28. Aug. 2021
- Permalink
- wandernn1-81-683274
- 29. Aug. 2021
- Permalink
Violet looks like mormon robot with heavy makeup, this film tries too hard to be something when there isn't something solid to grasp your attention.
I had to put on the subtitles because I couldn't understand what they were saying. Also, the dialog was off-putting.. who talks like that? There is a lot of added words to their lines that shouldn't be there. Overall the movie was awkward and almost mediocre.
- saligia-54947
- 11. Okt. 2021
- Permalink
Nowhere near as bad as the current rating of 3.6.
It's weird enough and creepy enough to pull it into the 6 range. The acting was acceptable and the direction was reasonably taut. While it wasn't the second coming of Rosemary's Baby it was better than Exorcist II - The Heretic!
It's weird enough and creepy enough to pull it into the 6 range. The acting was acceptable and the direction was reasonably taut. While it wasn't the second coming of Rosemary's Baby it was better than Exorcist II - The Heretic!
- shannon-bill
- 13. Apr. 2021
- Permalink
Most confusing movie ever, the writer need to explain it or rather tell us what they had in mind to produce it. I got thrown off many times doesn't even know when or how the guy hallucinate every seconds.
I read this review that pointed out so many bad things I needed to see for myself. So I purposely started a movie I knew wasn't supposed to be good and I'm writing this review like 6 minutes into the movie because in the opening scene I just LOVED the force a woman side flings a plate directly behind herself at like 200 mph. It was awesome. I've watched that plate throw 4 times. I may never actually make it to the end of this movie.
To say its a horror film is excessive as there is more tension and mystery than horror. Having said that Sophie Kargman does a really good job of being on the edge of deranged, although you're not quite sure.
I would say its more of a thriller with overtones. I think that we have become slightly insular to "horror" in films, so it needs to be really scary to be classed as a horror film.
I am not saying that some might find it horrific in places but I am sure that most won't. This doesn't detract from the off beat strangeness of the film as you are dragged along by the storyline.
Aiden Bristow works well as a believable character and you do feel for him and yet there is that nagging feeling in the back of your mind about him.
This is one of those films that if you don't watch it all you won't get it.
I found it very watchable and wasn't disappointed but I would have liked a little more depth to the plot.
I would say its more of a thriller with overtones. I think that we have become slightly insular to "horror" in films, so it needs to be really scary to be classed as a horror film.
I am not saying that some might find it horrific in places but I am sure that most won't. This doesn't detract from the off beat strangeness of the film as you are dragged along by the storyline.
Aiden Bristow works well as a believable character and you do feel for him and yet there is that nagging feeling in the back of your mind about him.
This is one of those films that if you don't watch it all you won't get it.
I found it very watchable and wasn't disappointed but I would have liked a little more depth to the plot.
- bladeofzorro
- 5. Apr. 2021
- Permalink
To a drunken sailor, early in the morning??? If you say im a believer youll get a stare of a goat flung in your face, and thats what i feel after struggling in the dark velvet of dark cinematography.
Imagine this happens today, its a couples relationship right on the edge of infinitum due to coronaisolation, the female part wont let the malepart leave the marriage because she thinks that loving you is a dirty job but somebodys got to do it, because love is in vain, and she declaims like robert palmer that shes addicted to love whatever and whenever. So to keep him under control the female drugs her very best friend to keep him at bait, at bait yes, convincing him that she has unbelievable strong evil forces under her wings, that will crush him every time he tries to break out to reach the realms of the male crisis center nearby...and so goes the riddle of this story.
Its really a psychopathetic cat and mouse doing the uncarted race through the roller coaster called love and empathy in a marriage thats become a frenzy of uneven domination, where the trix does the trick, and the doomed does the dirty work, because if the male doesnt do like his dominatrix says , she would awake his fear that she would die in his arms that night, with the message written all over the wall that if you cant hurt me i can hurt myself for you.
This was written by a delirious grumpy old man, demented by the films message, and doesnt know where to go or what to believe after watching. It has though a bloody end you may squirm yourself through insanitys 7 steps to reach.it is a psychedellicquasihorror on the bait, you will love it or just turn it of.
Productionwise its a well made film, the smallcast acts well, but its very crosslegged plotted till you feel the numbness of fatigue, and the story is like some of the most offbeat lyrics by bob dylan or the reality of a khardashian, so will i recommend a view???????????????
Imagine this happens today, its a couples relationship right on the edge of infinitum due to coronaisolation, the female part wont let the malepart leave the marriage because she thinks that loving you is a dirty job but somebodys got to do it, because love is in vain, and she declaims like robert palmer that shes addicted to love whatever and whenever. So to keep him under control the female drugs her very best friend to keep him at bait, at bait yes, convincing him that she has unbelievable strong evil forces under her wings, that will crush him every time he tries to break out to reach the realms of the male crisis center nearby...and so goes the riddle of this story.
Its really a psychopathetic cat and mouse doing the uncarted race through the roller coaster called love and empathy in a marriage thats become a frenzy of uneven domination, where the trix does the trick, and the doomed does the dirty work, because if the male doesnt do like his dominatrix says , she would awake his fear that she would die in his arms that night, with the message written all over the wall that if you cant hurt me i can hurt myself for you.
This was written by a delirious grumpy old man, demented by the films message, and doesnt know where to go or what to believe after watching. It has though a bloody end you may squirm yourself through insanitys 7 steps to reach.it is a psychedellicquasihorror on the bait, you will love it or just turn it of.
Productionwise its a well made film, the smallcast acts well, but its very crosslegged plotted till you feel the numbness of fatigue, and the story is like some of the most offbeat lyrics by bob dylan or the reality of a khardashian, so will i recommend a view???????????????
Too damn long and drawn out for me, my lord just walk out!!! Dialogue was so unnecessary....
- rohnee-71569
- 18. Aug. 2021
- Permalink
Man this movie sucked. Reminds me too much of Stephen King's Misery. With the way she threatens him, threatens to kill him or use a drill on him? Give me a break. Been there, Done that.
- curse-of-egypt
- 5. Sept. 2021
- Permalink
Suspenseful religious horror that borrows plot points from Rosemary's Baby (1968) and the Omen (1976) anti-christ. The pacing is very slow even for those of us used to slow paced film. But it's not bad. Definitely a watch alone type film.
- Horror_Flick_Fanatic
- 14. Okt. 2021
- Permalink
This movie was barely watchable, due to extremely slow pace and a wimpy leading man. I kept watching and the movie ended with a flourish to my amazement.
- turtleloverules
- 6. Sept. 2021
- Permalink
You won't know quite what's going on or if you've lived this moment a thousand times.
- davidgodbout611
- 3. Okt. 2021
- Permalink
- nogodnomasters
- 12. Apr. 2021
- Permalink
- candacewilliams-95314
- 4. Sept. 2021
- Permalink
Let alone marry. The only reason it gets two stars is that it doesn't look like it's filmed on someone's several-generations-old phone like a lot of movies on Tubi look, it has some competent shots, and it has a legitimate actor in Billy Zane, though he likely filmed his part in half a day at most.
Otherwise, it's watching two lame people with the personalities of ocean sponges stiffly talk nonsense as they stand or sit rigidly like strangers. These are people who shouldn't be together, and whatever the outcome of the movie (is he hallucinating, in limbo, etc.?), the road to get there is rough. I hate toxic people. I don't like spending time with them even in fiction no matter the context, so this is a slog to get through.
S/N: The main guy seems like a James Nguyen character who finally snapped.
Otherwise, it's watching two lame people with the personalities of ocean sponges stiffly talk nonsense as they stand or sit rigidly like strangers. These are people who shouldn't be together, and whatever the outcome of the movie (is he hallucinating, in limbo, etc.?), the road to get there is rough. I hate toxic people. I don't like spending time with them even in fiction no matter the context, so this is a slog to get through.
S/N: The main guy seems like a James Nguyen character who finally snapped.
- TokyoGyaru
- 20. Nov. 2021
- Permalink
This has to be one of the worst movies ever!! I've seen better acting in third grade plays. I seriously could not find one redeeming quality in the entire film. Don't waste your time!
- timberwolf-03371
- 9. Nov. 2022
- Permalink
Going into this movie I expected something conventional. Nothing in the description or the opening scene made it seem like it wouldn't be conventional. But after a very short time, it becomes clear this is a weird movie going out of its way to be dense and unclear, in a good way, playing up heavily the classic "is it something paranormal or is it mental illness?" trope, while also not making it clear who is the one suffering from this.
Lucas, the main character, is kind of an obnoxious, grating type of person who is constantly picking passive-aggressive fights with his wife Violet, who very clearly needs some special help or gentler handling, of which Lucas is absolutely not fit to provide. As such, this woman who is clearly constantly on edge and suppressing it with a cheery housewife facade, ends up having constant violent breakdowns in which she self-harms and Lucas seems incapable of not being the trigger in these instances.
But that doesn't end up being the real main focus of the film, as instead Lucas seems to be the one dealing with something unknown and mysterious, with Violet seeking out answers in the form of some barely coherent religiosity that isn't specific or concise enough to actually be religious.
The movie treads carefully along with regards to this conflict, and is almost fun as a result, especially when it comes to the suspicious interactions with Violet's parents and Lucas's psychologist.
But at the end, after having gone so delicately along the path of "is it real or is it imaginary?" and made it a point to not clearly explain anything, they spring some completely incoherent twist that gets thrown in our faces abruptly and which does not make any sense at all within the confines of the movie alone. As in, the ending only makes sense if you apply a certain religious belief to the film. If you were not a religious person or otherwise knowledgeable about certain religions, it would make absolutely no sense.
Lucas, the main character, is kind of an obnoxious, grating type of person who is constantly picking passive-aggressive fights with his wife Violet, who very clearly needs some special help or gentler handling, of which Lucas is absolutely not fit to provide. As such, this woman who is clearly constantly on edge and suppressing it with a cheery housewife facade, ends up having constant violent breakdowns in which she self-harms and Lucas seems incapable of not being the trigger in these instances.
But that doesn't end up being the real main focus of the film, as instead Lucas seems to be the one dealing with something unknown and mysterious, with Violet seeking out answers in the form of some barely coherent religiosity that isn't specific or concise enough to actually be religious.
The movie treads carefully along with regards to this conflict, and is almost fun as a result, especially when it comes to the suspicious interactions with Violet's parents and Lucas's psychologist.
But at the end, after having gone so delicately along the path of "is it real or is it imaginary?" and made it a point to not clearly explain anything, they spring some completely incoherent twist that gets thrown in our faces abruptly and which does not make any sense at all within the confines of the movie alone. As in, the ending only makes sense if you apply a certain religious belief to the film. If you were not a religious person or otherwise knowledgeable about certain religions, it would make absolutely no sense.
- phenomynouss
- 19. März 2022
- Permalink