IMDb-BEWERTUNG
3,3/10
7225
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Ein kleiner Junge sucht in einer Wüste der Zukunft nach einem angeblichen Heilmittel für seine sterbende Mutter.Ein kleiner Junge sucht in einer Wüste der Zukunft nach einem angeblichen Heilmittel für seine sterbende Mutter.Ein kleiner Junge sucht in einer Wüste der Zukunft nach einem angeblichen Heilmittel für seine sterbende Mutter.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
Jeff Wahlberg
- Prince
- (as Jeffrey Wahlberg)
Twin Shadow
- Ratcatcher
- (as George Lewis Jr.)
Method Man
- Tattooed Face
- (as Clifford 'Method Man' Smith)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
James Franco really doesn't know how to direct and should probably stay away from attempting it in the future. There really aren't many ways to describe this movie other than plain dumb, it's just not that good. It seems like this was more a project for some actors and rappers to goof around and enjoy themselves, which can work, if the story and acting doesn't suck.
I was going to write out a movie summary but decided it's really not needed. The movie takes place in essentially 4 "sets", a beautiful grove filled with flowing water and trees, a shack decorated to look like a brothel, an abandoned church in the middle of nowhere, and an abandoned resort in the middle of nowhere. They didn't build any of this, it's clear they filmed in random places they found, they didn't even bother dressing them up. Franco hams it up as the evil bad guy Warlord, Suki Waterhouse is a sexy robot, Snoop Dogg is a pimp (shocker), and Mila Jovavich is a chemist? Or something. I dunno, she somehow makes drugs from the crappiest looking chemistry set I've seen. Another dumb thing that irked me, this movie takes place over several days but not ONCE do they show what people eat or drink or how they get any of their resources. There's NOTHING else but the filming locations and it's all in the middle of nowhere. It a dumb thing to bother me but...3-4 days in the desert without a sip of water and no sign of dehydration? That's just basic character development. Which there is absolutely none of in this movie.
So why did I rate it a 4? Two stars for the film because it was shot relatively well, and two stars for Suki Waterhouse and Mila Jovavich looking hot as hell. Honestly just a really amateurish movie. It wants to be campy and cult status invoking...it's not. It's just dumb.
I was going to write out a movie summary but decided it's really not needed. The movie takes place in essentially 4 "sets", a beautiful grove filled with flowing water and trees, a shack decorated to look like a brothel, an abandoned church in the middle of nowhere, and an abandoned resort in the middle of nowhere. They didn't build any of this, it's clear they filmed in random places they found, they didn't even bother dressing them up. Franco hams it up as the evil bad guy Warlord, Suki Waterhouse is a sexy robot, Snoop Dogg is a pimp (shocker), and Mila Jovavich is a chemist? Or something. I dunno, she somehow makes drugs from the crappiest looking chemistry set I've seen. Another dumb thing that irked me, this movie takes place over several days but not ONCE do they show what people eat or drink or how they get any of their resources. There's NOTHING else but the filming locations and it's all in the middle of nowhere. It a dumb thing to bother me but...3-4 days in the desert without a sip of water and no sign of dehydration? That's just basic character development. Which there is absolutely none of in this movie.
So why did I rate it a 4? Two stars for the film because it was shot relatively well, and two stars for Suki Waterhouse and Mila Jovavich looking hot as hell. Honestly just a really amateurish movie. It wants to be campy and cult status invoking...it's not. It's just dumb.
Initially I gave this a 2/10 but after careful consideration I finally gave it a 3/10.
This is not the worst movie I have ever seen, but it comes very close, at least I can say, (not that it is a recommendation) I made it to the end without falling asleep.
It had some good moments, but the bad acting really stopped it being anything but bad. The standout actor was Jeffrey Wahlberg, who to me, is a bit of an unknown and worth watching out for in the future.
James Franco, who I usually like, really could have done better as could some of the other actors who I normally rate highly.
Don't waste your time. This genre has been done much better before.
This is not the worst movie I have ever seen, but it comes very close, at least I can say, (not that it is a recommendation) I made it to the end without falling asleep.
It had some good moments, but the bad acting really stopped it being anything but bad. The standout actor was Jeffrey Wahlberg, who to me, is a bit of an unknown and worth watching out for in the future.
James Franco, who I usually like, really could have done better as could some of the other actors who I normally rate highly.
Don't waste your time. This genre has been done much better before.
The only reason why I gave 1 star is because there was no way to give negative star in the rating system.
Can't believe how poor storyline and bad directing can make good actors / actresses can appear over acting.
I was keep on thiniking there might be a hidden plot and kept watching. BAD mistake. Totally waisted my time.
Can't believe how poor storyline and bad directing can make good actors / actresses can appear over acting.
I was keep on thiniking there might be a hidden plot and kept watching. BAD mistake. Totally waisted my time.
It's very sad to see good Actors telents go to waste in such a movie, story is somewhat like half Cyborg half Madmax, but Cinematography and Editing is really below average, i think James Franco's Team consisted of some teenager fans, or maybe he was too busy on his other projects that he didn't got the time for his direction. This movie will haunt him in coming days, Sorry Franco, direction is not for you bro.
Is it possible to take a group of A-list actors and make a really really awful B grade movie? Well yes, yes it is and in my opinion Future World is it.
This flicks screenplay, I suspect quite intentionally, tries to pay homage to late 70's dystopian films such as Mad Max and cheesy but watchable 80's sci fi like Cherry 2000. Regrettably, however, this film is more sacrilege than homage.
Future World simply fails to appreciate and understand the mechanics of what made these earlier films work. Things like fleshed out characterisations, an interesting, engaging story and decent narrative.
Suffice to say, I'd rather revisit the original films, than waste my time on this clumsy facsimile. 1/10 from me.
This flicks screenplay, I suspect quite intentionally, tries to pay homage to late 70's dystopian films such as Mad Max and cheesy but watchable 80's sci fi like Cherry 2000. Regrettably, however, this film is more sacrilege than homage.
Future World simply fails to appreciate and understand the mechanics of what made these earlier films work. Things like fleshed out characterisations, an interesting, engaging story and decent narrative.
Suffice to say, I'd rather revisit the original films, than waste my time on this clumsy facsimile. 1/10 from me.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesCurrently holds a 0% on rottentomatoes.com.
- PatzerIn this apocalyptic future, they can't find guns and bullets. But they find fuel and motorbike parts.
- VerbindungenReferences Alien: Das unheimliche Wesen aus einer fremden Welt (1979)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Future World?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Offizieller Standort
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Thế Giới Tương Lai
- Drehorte
- Salton Sea, Kalifornien, USA(location)
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 163.313 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 28 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.35 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen