Mu ji zhe
- 2017
- 1 Std. 58 Min.
Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuThe story about an ambitious journalist who eagerly pursues a long-forgotten accident. When the sole survivor of the accident suddenly disappears, he realizes that nothing is what it seems, ... Alles lesenThe story about an ambitious journalist who eagerly pursues a long-forgotten accident. When the sole survivor of the accident suddenly disappears, he realizes that nothing is what it seems, and the unimaginable dark truth will haunt him for the rest of his life.The story about an ambitious journalist who eagerly pursues a long-forgotten accident. When the sole survivor of the accident suddenly disappears, he realizes that nothing is what it seems, and the unimaginable dark truth will haunt him for the rest of his life.
- Auszeichnungen
- 9 Nominierungen insgesamt
- Used car boss (Special guest star)
- (as Bing-Shien Nieh)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Anyway... I just finished the movie, and I felt that it was very well put together. The pacing overall is rather slow considering it's almost 2 hour runtime, but if you follow everything and pay attention, it leads to a very powerful ending that you most likely will not expect... It is more of a Crime/Investigative Procedural rather than many of the more stylish Action films that come from there. The emphasis is more about the Slow-Burn Mystery than about flashy visuals. The acting across the board is quite strong. The atmosphere and cinematography, like the style of many of this type of film from the area, are nicely constructed and very effective. I particularly like the final montage during the last few lines.
Remember... Not everything is necessarily as it seems...
read my full review on my blog: cinema omnivore, thanks.
The title misguides audiences who anticipated Cock Robin in this film...
And the story is split around in the casts members. It is hard to keep track of the story if there is a story at all.
I hope standardised story structure is needed for this local blockbuster.
1 out of 10.
The plot is so simple. The lead character, a journalist investigates a cold accident case happened nine years ago. The film mainly includes about the accident, how it happened and who the culprit was. As the movie goes, it gets interesting even though it's a little boring. But not as boring as Blade Runner 2049 and it didn't make me sleepy even when I was feeling sleepy because I was about to go to bed when I watched this film. But the film kept me awake.
The main thing I like the most is they presented the accident one by one. As the film goes, you'll know how the accident happened one by one. Even though it almost arrives to the end, the story is not complete, but it fits. When the movie is coming to the end, all things become clear and you know the truth about that accident. It's a kind of film that you won't know who the responsible people are if you don't watch to the end.
They really made the film to make people excited. Well, it worked on me. Some scenes are so exciting because of the background sound. So, nice work with sound editing and mixing.
There are four things that I don't like. One is the main character actor. I mean everybody likes handsome boys are on leading role. But it doesn't mean that the actor is terrible. The performance of that leading actor was great. Also all other actors and actresses'. It'd be great if there were pretty boys. It's just my opinion. Hehe.
Second is the background sound. I accept the fact that they should make the audience excited while watching the film. But they also made other unexciting scenes too. I found a scene which wasn't that much exciting, but they made it to excite the audience. What a waste!
Thirdly, the apartments. But I don't know how it seem to the other people. But as for me, according to the video quality of the film I've got, the apartments looked creepy and haunted. When I saw those apartments, I was afraid. Not to mention living there, just seeing made afraid. They should have made the environment a little bit warmer.
The final one is sex scenes. I mean do people really like a film only there are kissing and sex scenes? I think Asians have also considered like that. So, they put kissing and sex scenes in the film just to get high rates. As for me, it's really a bad idea and also it reduces the standard of a film. You can call me old-fashioned or whatever, but I rather like normal films without such scenes.
All in all, it's wrapping with mysteries. And it's reveal method is part by part. It's like watching the flower blossom petal by petal. But before the last one reveled, the story also fits. It's like a camouflage. That is the only thing that made me like this film.
I don't know why some people thought this film was a bad one. Even it's not great to those people, it should be a fine film. I saw some reviewers don't give their best to an Asian film but they give to American films. I don't know why they do that. But all films deserve equality. So, I'd say it's a good one for me. As for you all, even it's not your favourite, it should be enjoyable.
The gist of the story is that of a hotshot journalist Chi (Kaiser Chuang) who decides to look into a hit-and-run that he had personally witnessed nine years ago on a stormy night after a present-day car accident reveals that the second-hand car he had bought not long ago was in fact the very one involved on that fateful evening. The longer version of that tells of the survivor, Ai-ting (Ko Chai Yen), who had escaped from the hospital not long after being admitted for her injuries and has since gone off the grid – worse, after Chi uses his investigative skills to locate her, she is abducted by someone who had been following Chi without his knowledge. Chi's initial digging through the newspaper archives during that time period also unearths the kidnap of a wealthy businessman's young daughter at about the same time, which relationship to the persons involved in the accident only becomes clearer much further down the road (pun intended).
Any whodunit is as good as its list of suspects, and there is an intriguing list here – beginning with Chi's mentor Chung-wen, whom Chi suspects of deleting some photos off his old camera nine years ago of the accident; to Chi's editor-in-chief Chiu (Christopher Lee), whose previous car's license plate number is one of the possible matches of the hit-and-run vehicle which Chi makes out in one of the deleted photos he eventually manages to retrieve; to Chi's mechanic and buddy Ji, whom Chiu claims borrowed his vehicle and was behind the wheel that night; and last but not least to a young unsmiling junior police constable Wei (Mason Lee) who works at the station where Chi's police contact resides and coincidentally stays in one of the units of the dense housing complex where Ai-ting could be held captive. In case you haven't realized, there are two related mysteries here – the identity of the hit-and-run driver and Ai-ting's kidnapper – which may or may not lead to the same culprit(s).
Though it isn't obvious right from the start, Cheng's technique is to play out each possible suspect's account of what happened that night, not simply whether those accounts which are genuine and accurate. As confusing as it may be to some, it demands that the audience pay attention to the inconsistencies and contradictions as Chi goes further down the rabbit hole, and trusting that the truth will emerge by the end of the two hours. The reassurance here is that it eventually does – and without ambiguity, we should add – so as much as some of the accounts are mere red herrings, it isn't that (or because) Chi and his two co-writers doesn't know where they want the story to lead to. Despite the manifold twists and turns especially in the third and final act, all the pieces do fall into place at the end, and in fact in grimmer and more perverse fashion than we had expected.
Oh yes, those looking for a happy ending best look elsewhere – there is none to be found here by the time the deeds and motivations of each one of the protagonists are laid bare. Not even Chi will emerge unscathed, and it suffices to say that it wasn't an altruistic pursuit of the truth that triggered his own investigation in the first place. Because each individual is ultimately harbouring some dirty, dark secret that he or she would rather not see the light of day, every one of them is in fact driven by their own self- preservation to one extent or another, the only difference being how far or committed they are to ensuring that their own selfish interests. These qualities are also what defines the characters here, and the actors do a decent job of fleshing them out, savoury or otherwise – of particular mention is our very own Lee, who exudes cold-hearted pragmatism in his portrayal of the grizzled journalism veteran with political ambitions.
Nevertheless, 'Who Killed Cock Robin' is admittedly less character- driven than plot-driven, in that its storytelling is based on unravelling what these respective characters were up to that fateful night when their lives collided in unfortunate manner. Even so, it does not sacrifice character consistency for plot surprises, so you can be reassured that none of the characters do stuff that is too illogical with their nature or credibility. Frankly, we were pleasantly surprised by how this crime thriller turned out. The setup is a little rushed at the start, but it settles down quickly to its own pace and rhythm once Chi starts getting into the thick of the mystery. Not that it slackens mind you; in fact, it is quite a gripping watch from start to finish, topped off with an ending that goes right to the darker side of human nature.
Wusstest du schon
- VerbindungenReferences Gin gwai 10 (2005)
Top-Auswahl
- How long is Who Killed Cock Robin??Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Offizielle Standorte
- Sprachen
- Auch bekannt als
- Who Killed Cock Robin?
- Drehorte
- Kaohsiung, Taiwan(entirely)
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 58 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.35 : 1