Beirut

One reviewer indicated this was not filmed in Beirut and the city wasn't in the condition as depicted. Not ever having been there I won't dispute but the images of the damages and treatment of individuals were horrifying and set the tone for the film. But, terrorist activities in the area has been well documented since recorded history. Jon Hamm was exceptional in the development of his character and Rosemary Pike may have been somewhat miscast but she managed her character fairly well. What was most disturbing was the probability of sacrificing one to maintain a precarious "peace" in the Region. And, of course, there is the issue of corruption by a U.S. official in another country (go figure). All in all it is a complex story with something of an unlikely conclusion but it was still extremely entertaining.

"I was a child during the Lebanese civil war, and I remember Israeli bombardments. So growing up, my view of Israel was completely negative. I'm not coming from a neutral place, but with time, I've had to re-examine my thinking." Ziad Doueiri (Lebanese director)

In the early '80's, Lebanon, and specifically Beirut, was a cauldron of conflicts that involved the interests of the US, the PLO, Israel, Syria, and Druze Militias. Director Brad Anderson and writer Tony Gilroy, reminding us of his fine work with Michael Clayton, carefully steer us through the city's growing rubble to chronicle the negotiations for a CIA spy to be exchanged for a rebel leader. Think The Year of Living Dangerously, Argo, and John le Carre for similar suspense.

Mason Skiles (Jon Hamm), a former US diplomat and current drunk, is called in as a skilled negotiator to bring back his friend, CIA agent Cal Riley (Mark Pellegrino), in a prisoner exchange. Hamm is particularly effective as a martini-soaked Cold War survivor whose role stateside after Lebanon as a labor negotiator has ennui written all over him.

Yet, this gig is fraught with danger because no one is a fool, and the smart players are too canny to be conned by a smooth talker like Mason. He has the good fortune to have his back guarded by cultural attaché Sandy Crowder (Rosamund Pike), an operative with multiple motives but a good bet to save the day.

Although little hope resides yet for a peace between Arabs and Israelis, the film succeeds in fleshing out the multiple points of view that have kept the Mideast a stew of ambitions and hatred. In the end, the film Beirut is an espionage thriller featuring an unBond, avowedly alcoholic hero. In that regard, it offers nothing new in this genre, just good action suspense and a modicum of insight.

The pace of this frenetic thriller set in the Lebanese Civil War is quick and smart with just enough character development to satisfy the harshest critics and enough turns in the negotiations to keep discerning audiences attentive and engaged. Be smart: see it.

Did find myself gripped by the trailer initially and the story sounded really interesting. A cast with the likes of John Hamm, Rosamund Pike (one of my main reasons for seeing the film) and Dean Norris also promised a good deal, and both Brad Anderson and Tony Gilroy have done solid work previous.

Although more divisive here, 'The Negotiator' from my understanding has as of now been received positively critically. It is not hard to see why, it is not perfect and falls short of being great but there are an awful lot of things to like. It did deserve to do better financially, having been a box office under-performer, and deserved much better than a limited release, not just in my country but worldwide too, where even then it would have been easy to miss with such tight competition released around the same time. With advertising that did it justice, rather than making it out to be a film far less complex and more insensitive than it actually is, and that it was released under the title 'The Negotiator' (a far more appealing title in the first place) worldwide instead of the misleading 'Beirut', the film would have fared better.

'The Negotiator' has a few faults. It does lose its way in the final third, where things lose momentum and plausibility declines. Felt too that the film resolved at the end too tidily.

For me, the music was on the intrusive side and while there was not much of a problem with the authenticity of it there was a problem with the placement, which could be inappropriate for the mood and not fitting that well.

Rosamund Pike does do very well in the acting stakes, but the character felt underwritten and underused somewhat, in general the character development was a little sketchy excepting the lead character.

However, 'The Negotiator' is slickly photographed and regardless of it not being the real location (though as said there have been many films that weren't made in the real life, either being done in another country or in the studio, and still manage to be good and even great to classic films) the scenery has beauty and grit. Anderson directs with control and tautness, giving alertness to the drama while allowing things to breathe too.

Gilroy's script is tightly structured, smart and thought-provoking, the political elements and connections not complicating the story despite their complexities. The story, while losing its way in the last act, is from the very start gripping, not hard to follow or dull and has a number of thrills and nail-biting suspense. Loved the meaty character writing for the lead character and his quite complex development and although some have said otherwise the film's representation of the Middle East/Beirut is far less insensitive than has been made out.

John Hamm in on top form here, at his best perhaps, and is rightfully the standout of the quite impeccable cast. Pike does very well being tough and sympathetic, and it was great seeing different roles for Dean Norris and Shea Whigham that contrast with the roles that they're most famous for.

Overall, not a great film and with its issues, namely the last act and the music, but gripping, intelligent and well cast and made. So much better than its misleading advertising, limited release, criticisms against it for not being authentic and being offensive (didn't think that personally) and financial under-performance indicates. 7/10 Bethany Cox

As a movie this is a solid, dependable thriller with a really solid performance by Jon Hamm, as well as by a range of supporting players who turn in good, taunt performances. The one exception is Rosamund Pike whom is a great actor, but is ill-used. I suspect there were a number of scenes left on the editing floor.

This movie will be controversial because of its depictions of Beirut, as well as lack of agency of the Lebanese people. These criticisms are valid, but at the same time it is very hard for Hollywood, let alone a Western director and writer to get the right nuance and tension of the period AND make a successful movie. To the critics, you have a point, but this is a thriller, not a documentary.

If you are looking for a modern spy/espionage movie, this should be on your list. Plus I would love to see more Jon Hamm in these types of roles...well done.

That's the basis for this taut, fast-paced actioner set in the Middle East of the 70's. John Hamm is a State Dept. negotiator coaxed out of retirement to find an American operative held by (select one) the Palestinians, Israelis, Lebanese or maybe the PLO. Be sure to bring a pad and pencil to keep track of the cast and which side they are on, because you never know in "Beirut".

For some reason, this picture is getting bad ratings from IMDb contributors. I don't know if here is a Hollywood conspiracy against it, but the bad reviewers are way off. "Beirut" needs to be seen by fans of edge-of-your-seat thriller fans. Just pay close attention as some info goes by quickly, which is in keeping with the complex plot and brisk pace of the movie.

My star rating is in the heading. The website no longer prints mine.