Der dritte Teil der Trilogie "Fifty Shades of Grey."Der dritte Teil der Trilogie "Fifty Shades of Grey."Der dritte Teil der Trilogie "Fifty Shades of Grey."
- Auszeichnungen
- 6 Gewinne & 10 Nominierungen insgesamt
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I never made it through the third book, but I have to say the movie was still decent. The low ratings make no sense to me. If you didn't like the first two, why would you watch the third? Just to complain about how bad it was for you?
I'm just glad they didn't split this into two movies.
This series is not brilliant, but still entertaining.
What a rough viewing. It seems like an atrociously bad episode of a crime show, with a heavy focus on the characters romantic relationship. Avoid this movie.
I have to be honest. I am not a fan of the series. Nor the books nor the films. It just didn't speak to me. However... My better half insisted this will be a fun movie. She prepared me it is no Dostoyevsky we were about to see but god almighty was I in shock how far it went. This must be the least coherent, most half-arsed, pointless movies I have ever seen in this sharade we call life. The sheer boredom spread through the unbearable laziness of the script, the empty looks of the actors, the meaningless cuts, senseless sequnces of the scenes... I just couldn't believed it... This was greenlit by someone?! Good god. Made me miss Twilight...
Here we go again..
I genuinely hoped.. there would've been change.
Sadly, I have to state the obvious: this is among the worst trilogies of film-making I' ve seen.
Acting? Bad. They were both there for a paycheck and nothing else.
Story? Well you see them getting married in the trailer.. and then you see her ex-boss picking up a gun, right? well there you have it.
Cinematogrophy: Worst than the first, but better than the second. Nothing to add there.
Dialogue: ... let's not go there..
All in all, i would give it a 1/10, because it was nice to look at some landscape for time to time. This review is short, because the movie was done short. it was bad from beginning to end, with horrible dialogue, with unstable emotions of both characters.. you get a sense of where this franchise couldve gone and done it right at the very end... but by then it meant nothing. god... I hate the writer who wrote it and I condemn writers like that back to wherever they came from.
I genuinely hoped.. there would've been change.
Sadly, I have to state the obvious: this is among the worst trilogies of film-making I' ve seen.
Acting? Bad. They were both there for a paycheck and nothing else.
Story? Well you see them getting married in the trailer.. and then you see her ex-boss picking up a gun, right? well there you have it.
Cinematogrophy: Worst than the first, but better than the second. Nothing to add there.
Dialogue: ... let's not go there..
All in all, i would give it a 1/10, because it was nice to look at some landscape for time to time. This review is short, because the movie was done short. it was bad from beginning to end, with horrible dialogue, with unstable emotions of both characters.. you get a sense of where this franchise couldve gone and done it right at the very end... but by then it meant nothing. god... I hate the writer who wrote it and I condemn writers like that back to wherever they came from.
The whole triology draws extreme attention, which is really sad for the film industry, and it says really much of the people today. This triology represents probably the biggest commercial junk there is, and the insane amount of people are here to see it, and, of course, are fulfilling the sole purpose of these films - money. I have watched all three films so I could give a review, but just thinking about it gives me an utter nausea, it was extremely hard to persevere through that toxic waste and to see other people enjoying the same.
What gets me the most is that the audience for independent films, art films are extremely small, and for making those films, people give their hearts out, those are the ones that have something to give to the audience and to the film industry itself - pure, raw art.
What gets me the most is that the audience for independent films, art films are extremely small, and for making those films, people give their hearts out, those are the ones that have something to give to the audience and to the film industry itself - pure, raw art.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThe cover for the DVD box of "Fifty Shades Freed" is the exact opposite of Fifty Shades Of Grey (2015). For the first movie's box cover, Anastasia is the one with her arms up, while Christian is the one about to kiss her, but for this movie's box cover, Christian is the one with his arms up, while Anastasia is about to kiss him.
- PatzerAna is able to withdraw $5 million in cash from her bank in a matter of minutes, but no bank routinely keeps that much cash on hand.
- Zitate
Christian Grey: You insist on defying me, Mrs. Grey. What should I do about that?
Anastasia Steele: [smiling] Learn to live with it.
- Crazy CreditsThere's a mid-credits scene: A couple of years later, Anastasia and Christian are playing with their son. She's pregnant again.
- Alternative VersionenThe running time quoted by IMDB, "1h 45m," is for the theatrical version. There is also a longer, unrated version, released chiefly for home distribution, running at 1 hr 50 min, five minutes longer. The unrated version includes, among other scenes, two with Kim Basinger, who plays Elena Lincoln, an ex-girlfriend of Christian, and supposed origin of his peculiar tastes. Kim Basinger earlier starred in the movie "9½ Weeks" (1986), a movie about a woman who begins an affair with a man that is characterized by unusual sex games, like the sex in the Fifty Shades trilogy. The book that that movie is based on, by author Elizabeth McNeil (a pseudonym for Ingeborg Day) is, like the "Fifty Shades" books, much more explicit about the S&M aspects of the relationship, although it concludes with an "unhappy" ending, wherein the relationship ends badly. Another difference is that Elizabeth McNeil's original novel is supposedly based on a true story, whereas the author of the Fifty Shades trilogy has never made that claim.
- VerbindungenEdited into Funny or Die Presents...: Fifty Shades of DeVito (2018)
- SoundtracksCapital Letters
Written by Ellie Goulding, BloodPop (as BloodPop®), Raye (as Rachel Keen), Ely Weisfeld, Andy Jackson (as Andrew Jackson), Hailee Steinfeld
Performed by Hailee Steinfeld x BloodPop (as BloodPop®)
Produced by BloodPop (as BloodPop®)
Orchestral Arrangements by Pete Anthony & David Buckley
Hailee Steinfeld appears courtesy of Republic Records
BloodPop® appears courtesy of GENPOP, Corp. under management by Mastor Craft/Blood Company
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Fifty Shades Freed?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box Office
- Budget
- 55.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 100.407.760 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 38.560.195 $
- 11. Feb. 2018
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 371.985.018 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 45 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.39 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen