A complex saga of humans scattered on planets throughout the galaxy all living under the rule of the Galactic Empire.A complex saga of humans scattered on planets throughout the galaxy all living under the rule of the Galactic Empire.A complex saga of humans scattered on planets throughout the galaxy all living under the rule of the Galactic Empire.
- Nominated for 2 Primetime Emmys
- 3 wins & 29 nominations total
Browse episodes
Summary
Reviewers say 'Foundation' is a visually impressive sci-fi series with strong performances, especially from Lee Pace and Jared Harris. However, it faces criticism for significant deviations from Isaac Asimov's original books, including changes in character genders and storylines. Some viewers appreciate the modernization, while others feel it loses Asimov's essence. The series is lauded for its production values and epic scope but faulted for inconsistent writing and pacing. Non-book readers tend to enjoy it more, while original fans express disappointment.
Featured reviews
Foundation offers a visually engaging journey through a sprawling sci-fi universe, with scenery that helps establish its futuristic settings quite effectively. While not always flawless, the production design and visual effects create a believable world that supports the story without overwhelming it.
The storytelling is ambitious, adapting Isaac Asimov's complex saga into a layered narrative that sometimes feels dense but often succeeds in keeping viewers intrigued. The pacing can be uneven, but the series generally manages to balance its big ideas with character-driven moments, which adds some emotional weight.
Acting performances vary, with the lead delivering a solid portrayal that grounds the show's more abstract concepts. Some supporting actors bring welcome depth, though a few characters come off as underdeveloped, leaving their motivations a bit unclear.
Where the show stumbles most noticeably is in its approach to casting. There's a clear, almost mechanical attempt at ticking demographic boxes, which occasionally undermines the authenticity of the world. In a galaxy where faster-than-light travel and psychohistory are accepted without question, the most jarring fiction ends up being the idea that every institution and culture has been carefully curated for maximum contemporary optics. Rather than feeling inclusive, it often feels oddly artificial - like a diversity committee crash-landed on Trantor. Representation matters, but subtlety matters too.
Overall, Foundation is a thoughtful and occasionally compelling adaptation that sci-fi fans might appreciate for its ideas and setting. It's not without its flaws, but it carves out a respectable place among contemporary science fiction series.
The storytelling is ambitious, adapting Isaac Asimov's complex saga into a layered narrative that sometimes feels dense but often succeeds in keeping viewers intrigued. The pacing can be uneven, but the series generally manages to balance its big ideas with character-driven moments, which adds some emotional weight.
Acting performances vary, with the lead delivering a solid portrayal that grounds the show's more abstract concepts. Some supporting actors bring welcome depth, though a few characters come off as underdeveloped, leaving their motivations a bit unclear.
Where the show stumbles most noticeably is in its approach to casting. There's a clear, almost mechanical attempt at ticking demographic boxes, which occasionally undermines the authenticity of the world. In a galaxy where faster-than-light travel and psychohistory are accepted without question, the most jarring fiction ends up being the idea that every institution and culture has been carefully curated for maximum contemporary optics. Rather than feeling inclusive, it often feels oddly artificial - like a diversity committee crash-landed on Trantor. Representation matters, but subtlety matters too.
Overall, Foundation is a thoughtful and occasionally compelling adaptation that sci-fi fans might appreciate for its ideas and setting. It's not without its flaws, but it carves out a respectable place among contemporary science fiction series.
To me Brother Day played by Lee Pace has become as enjoyable to watch as Daenerys played by Emilia Clarke in GOT. There's a lot of confusing, boring bits and vexing characters in the show but Brother Day keeps me coming for more.
Overall it's a quality show albeit flawed. But there's a lot of unique, and daring approach that still make this show worth a watch. Every scene and every new information that is revealed about Cleons is so engaging and interesting.
If you're into sci-fi I'd definitely recommend trying this show and giving it a shot at least till season two because it actually even improves in the second season.
Overall it's a quality show albeit flawed. But there's a lot of unique, and daring approach that still make this show worth a watch. Every scene and every new information that is revealed about Cleons is so engaging and interesting.
If you're into sci-fi I'd definitely recommend trying this show and giving it a shot at least till season two because it actually even improves in the second season.
Let's start with this - if you're an orthodox fan and believe books should be adapted sentence by sentence, it's simple - don't watch.
For those who don't know the books, I'll start by saying I've read most of Asimov's books. The Foundation cycle began to be written in the 1950s. After a long break, more books appeared in the 1980s. In this case, modernization seems not only justified but even necessary. Unless you like a strong retro vibe where the Galactic Empire is completely based on nuclear energy, which represents humanity's greatest achievement. Similarly, contemporary viewers will relate much better to Seldon as a consciousness transferred to a computer than to films recorded on tape by Seldon and watched (or ignored) by descendants. Moreover, it's worth adding that Asimov's saga is famous for internal inconsistencies. For example, initially Trantor is located in the center of the galaxy, as befits an empire's capital, later it's on the galaxy's arms where there's no dangerous radiation from the galaxy's center - Asimov repeatedly changed details in the novels, adapting them to the progress of knowledge.
The series has been extremely modernized; we can watch fantastic technologies and absolutely stunning shots. Which I mostly rate as a plus. A certain flaw of the series is its distinctly different character. The series is much more adventure-oriented, individualistic, and brutal (especially in the Season 3 finale there's quite a bit of senseless carnage), but it's also more mature. The Foundation saga, despite its political and social scope and, for the 1950s, often considerable courage, was nevertheless quite infantile.
The acting is good, the characters are very diverse. In my opinion, the best-written character is Demerzel (Laura Birn); for those who've read the books, she once bore the name Daneel, among others. It's an excellent development of Daneel's character, more realistic and deeper (though the way she holds her hands and the robes she wears are awful). The worst-written is the Mule (Pilou Asbaek). He's been exaggerated into a sadistic brute and in a sense split into two characters because Magnifico Giganticus (Tomas Lemarquis) is a second character in the series. And actually three characters, but I won't write what the third is. I had high hopes for the Mule, which the series didn't fulfill. Though for a change, the marriage of Bayta (Synnove Karlsen) and Toran (Cody Fern) Mallow, connected in some way to the Mule, was extremely skillfully modernized. Modernization is one of the series' greatest assets. But even in this regard, there are slip-ups. The imperial weapon in the form of a black hole launcher is great, but unfortunately the creators didn't think or ignored that a black hole wouldn't stop after swallowing a planet; it would grow and fly further, perhaps in a different direction. Distance shouldn't be any problem for this weapon (so why not attack the Mule?). To put it bluntly, here the creators overdid it in a way typical of Nolan's pseudoscientific films. A shame.
It's somewhat difficult to rate this series unequivocally. It's certainly an ambitious attempt to modernize Foundation. At times it departs very strongly from the original, but usually in a good direction. It's definitely more mature but often unnecessarily brutal. Sometimes there are slip-ups, but rarely. I think 8 stars is a good rating.
For those who don't know the books, I'll start by saying I've read most of Asimov's books. The Foundation cycle began to be written in the 1950s. After a long break, more books appeared in the 1980s. In this case, modernization seems not only justified but even necessary. Unless you like a strong retro vibe where the Galactic Empire is completely based on nuclear energy, which represents humanity's greatest achievement. Similarly, contemporary viewers will relate much better to Seldon as a consciousness transferred to a computer than to films recorded on tape by Seldon and watched (or ignored) by descendants. Moreover, it's worth adding that Asimov's saga is famous for internal inconsistencies. For example, initially Trantor is located in the center of the galaxy, as befits an empire's capital, later it's on the galaxy's arms where there's no dangerous radiation from the galaxy's center - Asimov repeatedly changed details in the novels, adapting them to the progress of knowledge.
The series has been extremely modernized; we can watch fantastic technologies and absolutely stunning shots. Which I mostly rate as a plus. A certain flaw of the series is its distinctly different character. The series is much more adventure-oriented, individualistic, and brutal (especially in the Season 3 finale there's quite a bit of senseless carnage), but it's also more mature. The Foundation saga, despite its political and social scope and, for the 1950s, often considerable courage, was nevertheless quite infantile.
The acting is good, the characters are very diverse. In my opinion, the best-written character is Demerzel (Laura Birn); for those who've read the books, she once bore the name Daneel, among others. It's an excellent development of Daneel's character, more realistic and deeper (though the way she holds her hands and the robes she wears are awful). The worst-written is the Mule (Pilou Asbaek). He's been exaggerated into a sadistic brute and in a sense split into two characters because Magnifico Giganticus (Tomas Lemarquis) is a second character in the series. And actually three characters, but I won't write what the third is. I had high hopes for the Mule, which the series didn't fulfill. Though for a change, the marriage of Bayta (Synnove Karlsen) and Toran (Cody Fern) Mallow, connected in some way to the Mule, was extremely skillfully modernized. Modernization is one of the series' greatest assets. But even in this regard, there are slip-ups. The imperial weapon in the form of a black hole launcher is great, but unfortunately the creators didn't think or ignored that a black hole wouldn't stop after swallowing a planet; it would grow and fly further, perhaps in a different direction. Distance shouldn't be any problem for this weapon (so why not attack the Mule?). To put it bluntly, here the creators overdid it in a way typical of Nolan's pseudoscientific films. A shame.
It's somewhat difficult to rate this series unequivocally. It's certainly an ambitious attempt to modernize Foundation. At times it departs very strongly from the original, but usually in a good direction. It's definitely more mature but often unnecessarily brutal. Sometimes there are slip-ups, but rarely. I think 8 stars is a good rating.
I remember watching the first couple episodes and not being very impressed. Not necessarily hating it, but not intrigued. It felt like a very traditional sci-fi series, akin to dune or star wars. A year or two later, i tried watching again... and now i'm somehow roped in and invested and binged most of the show well into 4 in the morning.
Great visual effects, music, vfx, product and costume design, even acting. Really intriguing clone concept (and a very obvious anagram for Cleon). Fantastic world building and i appreciated the non-linear storytelling. Interested to see where this series will take us!
Great visual effects, music, vfx, product and costume design, even acting. Really intriguing clone concept (and a very obvious anagram for Cleon). Fantastic world building and i appreciated the non-linear storytelling. Interested to see where this series will take us!
Beat till now, After S1, S3 is actually refreshing but watch slowly maybe 1 episode a week it's really good especially from S3E7 every episode Is evolving in many beautiful stories & have good potential to evolve in many beautiful seasons. I like it 🙏🏼 good work team foundation love your work, beautiful cinematography.
Our 2025 TV Guide
Our 2025 TV Guide
Take a peek at the biggest new and returning series coming to your screens in 2025, including new seasons of "Pluribus," "Percy Jackson," and the series finale of "Stranger Things."
Soundtrack
Preview the soundtrack here and continue listening on Amazon Music.
Did you know
- TriviaAsimov's Foundation was originally published as a short story series in Astounding Magazine between May 1942 and January 1950, based on ideas in Edward Gibbon's History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.
- Crazy creditsThe opening titles is a montage of radiant energy particles forming various shapes.
The shapes vary with each season.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Late Night with Seth Meyers: Paul Rudd/Jared Harris/Nate Smith (2021)
Details
- Runtime
- 1h(60 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.00 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content




