Un gruppo di amici è terrorizzato da uno stalker che è a conoscenza di un raccapricciante incidente del loro passato.Un gruppo di amici è terrorizzato da uno stalker che è a conoscenza di un raccapricciante incidente del loro passato.Un gruppo di amici è terrorizzato da uno stalker che è a conoscenza di un raccapricciante incidente del loro passato.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Gabbriette
- Tyler
- (as Gabbriette Bechtel)
Riepilogo
Reviewers say 'I Know What You Did Last Summer' was a mix of nostalgia, modernized elements, and homages to the original film. Common themes include the effectiveness of suspenseful scenes and the return of legacy characters. Some reviewers dislike the film's reliance on the original's formula, the performances of the new and returning cast, and the impact of the film's twist. Others appreciate the film's attempt to connect with a new generation. The film's pacing, humor, and character development are also frequently mentioned. Overall, the movie is seen as a fun, if flawed, addition to the franchise.
Recensioni in evidenza
It's nice to see a sequel years later of one of my favorite movies ever, but is it really necessary?
It tries so hard to mimick everything from the original that it gets old REALLY quick.
Unlike sequels to other older movies like Star Wars, Halloween or even Hocus Pocus that the new characters are so boring that you just don't care what happens to them, the new ones are OK. Not good, just ok. Except Danica, she's horrible. And I liked that they weren't just copies of the original cast, they FEEL like a new group.
The killer reveal was dumb and the last scene is just another "yeah girl power" moment that no one asked for.
Honestly, I like going out yesterday to watch it, but I won't be seeing this one again. The original I've seen about 20 times and it never gets old.
It tries so hard to mimick everything from the original that it gets old REALLY quick.
Unlike sequels to other older movies like Star Wars, Halloween or even Hocus Pocus that the new characters are so boring that you just don't care what happens to them, the new ones are OK. Not good, just ok. Except Danica, she's horrible. And I liked that they weren't just copies of the original cast, they FEEL like a new group.
The killer reveal was dumb and the last scene is just another "yeah girl power" moment that no one asked for.
Honestly, I like going out yesterday to watch it, but I won't be seeing this one again. The original I've seen about 20 times and it never gets old.
This movie spits on the original in the most crude way possible. This was bad through and through.
Dull actors who can't deliver their lines believably. Bad special effects. Boring all the way through, predictable from the start.
The script was laughably awful.
This was more comedy than horror, pure comedy.
Dull actors who can't deliver their lines believably. Bad special effects. Boring all the way through, predictable from the start.
The script was laughably awful.
This was more comedy than horror, pure comedy.
The first 2 minutes are as good as it gets - the inner monologue of a 25 point IQ who chose UofMich - enough said - she should be offed just for that. Terrible lighting, terrible acting, script sucks - you were hoping they all died - but it took 31 minutes for the first dead body. You couldn't tell any of the characters apart and the location/set up was so ridiculous. Seriously - THIS is your idea of a reboot of a great movie?
There are no long chases, no suspense building, no character development, no chemistry among the cast, all the kills happen incredibly quickly. Madelyn Cline is insufferable.
I walked out of this movie not remembering the name of any of the new characters and wishing none of them survived. WAIT FOR STREAMING. I can't believe the OG cast came back for this, they are either really desperate for money or didn't bother reading the script. I lost count of the plot holes and absurd storylines that went nowhere. And the cheesy dialogue OH MY LORD
As a big fan of the original this is nothing but a shameless cash grab.
I walked out of this movie not remembering the name of any of the new characters and wishing none of them survived. WAIT FOR STREAMING. I can't believe the OG cast came back for this, they are either really desperate for money or didn't bother reading the script. I lost count of the plot holes and absurd storylines that went nowhere. And the cheesy dialogue OH MY LORD
As a big fan of the original this is nothing but a shameless cash grab.
The film opens with upbeat, trendy music that instantly sets a Scream VI vibe-never a good sign if you're hoping for originality. From the start, it's clear this isn't going to break new ground. We follow a group of American "teens": conventionally attractive girls paired with alpha-male archetypes, with Jonah Hauer-King oddly miscast and feeling out of place.
The premise hasn't evolved since the 1997 original: a group of friends covers up a death, only to be stalked one year later by the iconic fisherman in his rain slicker. He picks them off one by one, sometimes extending his vengeance to their loved ones. That's it. There's little substance beyond this familiar formula. Legacy characters from the original film return, but rather than adding emotional depth or clever twists, their presence feels like a shallow callback. Freddie Prinze Jr., in particular, gives a performance that weirdly channels Dermot Mulroney from Scream VI; not exactly flattering.
Several sequences simply don't make sense. In one, Teddy tries to fix the sliding doors on his boat, even though we can clearly see someone lurking at the end of the corridor. His behavior makes it seem as if he's conspiring with the killer rather than in danger. When he eventually fights the fisherman, the scene plays more like roughhousing with a buddy than a desperate struggle for survival. Later, Teddy's father mourns his son while heavy footsteps of the killer are blatantly audible in the background. Yet the father never reacts. It's sloppy staging, and moments like these kill any suspense.
Acting quality is inconsistent at best. Characters flip from panic to casual nonchalance within minutes, destroying any sense of tension. For a slasher from 1997, some of these choices might have slid by unnoticed, but for a 2025 release they feel outdated and careless.
Ultimately, this revival offers nothing fresh: no new angle, no genuine scares, and no compelling performances. It's a reheated version of a story that was already thin, relying on nostalgia rather than creativity.
The premise hasn't evolved since the 1997 original: a group of friends covers up a death, only to be stalked one year later by the iconic fisherman in his rain slicker. He picks them off one by one, sometimes extending his vengeance to their loved ones. That's it. There's little substance beyond this familiar formula. Legacy characters from the original film return, but rather than adding emotional depth or clever twists, their presence feels like a shallow callback. Freddie Prinze Jr., in particular, gives a performance that weirdly channels Dermot Mulroney from Scream VI; not exactly flattering.
Several sequences simply don't make sense. In one, Teddy tries to fix the sliding doors on his boat, even though we can clearly see someone lurking at the end of the corridor. His behavior makes it seem as if he's conspiring with the killer rather than in danger. When he eventually fights the fisherman, the scene plays more like roughhousing with a buddy than a desperate struggle for survival. Later, Teddy's father mourns his son while heavy footsteps of the killer are blatantly audible in the background. Yet the father never reacts. It's sloppy staging, and moments like these kill any suspense.
Acting quality is inconsistent at best. Characters flip from panic to casual nonchalance within minutes, destroying any sense of tension. For a slasher from 1997, some of these choices might have slid by unnoticed, but for a 2025 release they feel outdated and careless.
Ultimately, this revival offers nothing fresh: no new angle, no genuine scares, and no compelling performances. It's a reheated version of a story that was already thin, relying on nostalgia rather than creativity.
New and Upcoming Book-to-Screen Adaptations
New and Upcoming Book-to-Screen Adaptations
From literary classics to graphic novels and more, see what books have recently made, or will be making the leap to the big (and small) screen in 2025 and beyond.
Colonna sonora
Visualizza l'anteprima della colonna sonora qui e continua ad ascoltarla su Amazon Music.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizWriter-director Jennifer Kaytin Robinson couldn't bring Sarah Michelle Gellar's Helen Shivers back to life for this sequel. In a conversation with Entertainment Weekly, Robinson said she "tried relentlessly" to fit Gellar into the new "I Know What You Did Last Summer." Her efforts were for naught because Robinson could not maneuver around the fact that Helen Shivers is dead. "I tried, okay? I harassed her! But she is dead," Robinson said. "I tried to pitch some crazy shit too. I was like, 'What if it's like you weren't dead and you're actually alive, but in hiding?' And Sarah's like, 'I was on ice. I was the most dead a person could be. You can see my frozen body.' I was like, 'Yeah, but what if?' And she said, 'I am dead. I am Sarah Dead Gellar.'"
- BlooperWhen the giant round cage chandelier falls on Ava, imprisoning her, why doesn't she just knock it over and crawl out the bottom instead of trying to open the door? If it's light enough to be suspended, it should be light enough to be pushed over.
- Citazioni
Karla Wilson: People are always trying to kill that woman. I hope she's in therapy.
- Curiosità sui creditiThere's a mid-credits scene.
- Colonne sonoreTiny Screens
Written by Jack Shuter and Chloe Slater
Performed by Chloe Slater
Courtesy of stolen juice
By arrangement with AWAL Recordings Ltd
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is I Know What You Did Last Summer?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Siti ufficiali
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Sé lo que hicieron el verano pasado
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Australia(Paddington, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia)
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 18.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 32.165.634 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 12.755.359 USD
- 20 lug 2025
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 64.808.120 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 51min(111 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti






