Neon_Gold

I thought this was a mess?

It was so heavy loaded at the front with so much exposition that really didn't matter.

I keep seeing people praising the ensemble cast...well yeah there is an ensemble cast but they don't do anything? They just hang around in the background for most of the movie.

I liked the mystery...I think. But I just didn't enjoy it as much as the other ones.

I liked the atmosphere of this one, the old haunted feel but again I have an issue... 15 minutes into this movie I turned to my husband and said "this was 100% shot in England". It was the most British church Iv ever seen. Maybe if they wanted to use these location, just set it in England this time, since a good chunk the cast was from the UK anyway!!

I felt like Daniel Craig didn't really have a lot to do in this movie. He seemed like an after thought in this movie.

Really bombastic and still stands up even after so much time.

I think you can feel the stage show-ness seep into the scenes but I don't think it's a bad thing. Because it's such an old movie, the beats of a stage show work with the rhythm of the dialogue.

It was a very interesting watch and the time did progress very quickly.

I wanna praise it for its good ideas and its fresh takes.

But there was a lot of issues. Mainly the script. The dialogue was god awful. It was laughably bad at times. That compared with the acting...wow.

It's embarrassing that the dog acted circles around the main cast. What happened with the acting!?