El nuevo proceso de una corporación de generar energía barata e ilimitada puede causar la destrucción de la Tierra.El nuevo proceso de una corporación de generar energía barata e ilimitada puede causar la destrucción de la Tierra.El nuevo proceso de una corporación de generar energía barata e ilimitada puede causar la destrucción de la Tierra.
- Dirección
- Escritura
- Estrellas
Lauren K. Robek
- Christine Marshall
- (as Kirsten Robek)
Roger Cross
- Detective
- (as Roger R. Cross)
Ulla Friis
- Tech #3
- (as Ulla Fris)
Matthew Sulzle
- MOW
- (sin créditos)
- Dirección
- Escritura
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
I basically watched this movie for Amanda Tapping. I'm a huge fan of her. And I wasn't disappointed. I agree with some of the other comments that the storyline was disappointing, but what Amanda did with her character was quite amazing especially considering what she's been given. While her character in some ways reminded me of her Stargate SG-1 character, she gave her a completely different behaviour and much more softness - surpassed Adrian Paul and Malcolm MacDowell by far. If you're a fan of her, rent/buy it now. At least that's my suggestion.
This film addresses a real concern of sorts, questions which were brought up about the Heavy Relatavistic Ion Collider which used a particle accellerator to smash gold atoms together in order to study exotic quarks. It was theorized that only a one in a billion trillion squillion chance of creating a particle-sized singularity (infinite volume in zero mass) that creates black holes, gravitational wells and event horizons. So much for media scares. Why actually watched 10 minutes of the film was because I like Amanda Tapping. I then watched another ten minutes because all of a sudden she was apparently geting tastefully nude. After another ten minutes I turned off again. I think it may have been a body double, but who cares. Amanda Tapping is gorgeous, no matter whose breasts were on the screen. The film? Ah. Well, if it was made with a big budget and heavyweight hollywood actors, say, Harrison Ford and Susan Sarandon, it would be considered worthy, though provoking material. A shame a proper, real science story has been let down by poor budgeting, and the fact that Amanda Tapping is marvellous, but not well known enough for film work. On the other hand, nice breasts.
They could've made the film a bit more interesting if they showed more action, as it was they did leave it a bit late and didn't put much in and therefore lost out in a way.
Although some major sci-fi fans maybe disappointed by not seeing the actual black hole for very long the rest of the film is really good.
This type of storyline has been used many times before but even so I found the film interesting from start to finish.
Amanda Tapping (Stargate's Major Samantha Carter) is a favourite of mine and Malcolm McDowell is great as "the bad guy"
I would recommend this film, I maybe easy to please but it's one of my favourites
Although some major sci-fi fans maybe disappointed by not seeing the actual black hole for very long the rest of the film is really good.
This type of storyline has been used many times before but even so I found the film interesting from start to finish.
Amanda Tapping (Stargate's Major Samantha Carter) is a favourite of mine and Malcolm McDowell is great as "the bad guy"
I would recommend this film, I maybe easy to please but it's one of my favourites
I watched this movie only because Amanda Tapping was cast in it. Although she did show great acting skill and proved beyond a doubt that she is NOT a bimbo, I was disappointed by the obvious use of a body double for the brief nude scenes. I hope Amanda will get an opportunity to star in a higher budget movie soon and that she will not be so shy about nudity. From a scientific standpoint, this was a plausible movie. From a point of reality it is a bit foolish. For example, when they are both tied to chairs and expecting to be executed, the dialogue and behavior seemed unreal. Amanda's character showed conviction and perseverance to show the data error, but then surrendered so easily when captured. Just not consistent behavior for the character. This movie is a must see for all Star gate fans, as the movie does prove Amanda's acting skills.
There's no black hole sucking down a city street as depicted on the video box cover, so let's dismiss that from the start. There's something sort of like that in the floor of a laboratory.
As it starts, a particle accelerator lab is doing an experiment that its chief does not approve of, but which the physicist played by Malcolm McDowell has somehow pulled rank and gotten through - though he is 5,000 miles away. Lucky for him he wasn't there, too, since everybody dies.
Years later, he's up to the same thing, expecting it to work this time (he's actually on site). The daughter of the chief who died in the previous experiment hopes to find proof of what happened, and learns it's about to happen again, only worse.
It's not a bad movie, though overlong. I thought on its apparent budget it did make good use of special effects. Not worth seeking out, though, unless you're a particular fan of any of the lead actors.
As it starts, a particle accelerator lab is doing an experiment that its chief does not approve of, but which the physicist played by Malcolm McDowell has somehow pulled rank and gotten through - though he is 5,000 miles away. Lucky for him he wasn't there, too, since everybody dies.
Years later, he's up to the same thing, expecting it to work this time (he's actually on site). The daughter of the chief who died in the previous experiment hopes to find proof of what happened, and learns it's about to happen again, only worse.
It's not a bad movie, though overlong. I thought on its apparent budget it did make good use of special effects. Not worth seeking out, though, unless you're a particular fan of any of the lead actors.
¿Sabías que…?
- ErroresEva Soderstrom mentions the Tunguska event in Siberia to Steven Price. She states it happened in 1907, when in fact it actually occurred 30 June 1908. She refers to Tunguska as a place, while Tunguska actually refers to the Stony Tunguska River. The nearest actual place to the Tunguska event site, per Google Maps, is Vanavara, Russia, about 40 miles south of the location of the Tunguska event site.
- Citas
[first lines]
Automated Voice: Video conference linkup with Washington coming in.
Tech #1: Dr. Abernathy, how are you today?
Dr. Thomas Abernathy: I am well, Eva. I trust we're ready to go?
Tech #1: We are, sir.
Dr. Thomas Abernathy: Good. I'm anxious to proceed.
Tech #1: Initiate beam dump. Fill the anti-proton storage ring.
- ConexionesReferenced in The Black Hole (2006)
- Bandas sonorasIs Nothing Sacred?
Written by Mark LeVang (as Mark Le Vang) & Rick Cowling
Published by Mom's Fudge / BMI
Performed by Rachel Marotta
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 33min(93 min)
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta




