[go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

The Guide to Supernatural Fiction

Rate this book
"a full description of 1,775 books"

723 pages, Hardcover

First published January 1, 1983

47 people want to read

About the author

E.F. Bleiler

62 books13 followers
Everett Franklin Bleiler (April 30, 1920 – June 13, 2010) (see also Everett F. Bleiler) was an editor, bibliographer, and scholar of science fiction, detective fiction, and fantasy literature. In the late 1940s and early 1950s, he co-edited the first "year's best" series of science fiction anthologies, and his Checklist of Fantastic Literature has been called "the foundation of modern SF bibliography". Among his other scholarly works are two Hugo Award–nominated volumes concerning early science fiction—Science-Fiction: The Early Years and Science-Fiction: The Gernsback Years—and the massive Guide to Supernatural Fiction.

Bleiler worked at Dover Publications from 1955, becoming executive vice-president of the company from 1967 until he left the company in 1977; he then worked for Charles Scribner's Sons until 1987. He edited a number of ghost story collections for Dover, containing what the genre historian Mike Ashley has described as "detailed and exemplary introductions".

Bleiler received the Pilgrim Award for lifetime achievement in science fiction scholarship in 1984, the World Fantasy Award for Life Achievement in 1988, the First Fandom Hall of Fame award in 1994, and the International Horror Guild Living Legend award in 2004.

Bleiler wrote two works of fiction: the fantasy novel Firegang: A Mythic Fantasy (2006), set in the tree of Yggdrasil as well as moving across time and space, and Magistrate Mai and the Invisible Murderer (2006), a detective story set in ancient China, similar to the work of Robert Van Gulik.

Bleiler's son, Richard, is also a science fiction historian and assisted his father on several of his works.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
18 (81%)
4 stars
3 (13%)
3 stars
1 (4%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Shawn.
871 reviews217 followers
October 27, 2020
Yes, I read this reference book - cover to cover - took me 9 months. To get the general out of the way first - this is an excellent resource that offers critical analysis on "supernatural" fiction (we'll come back to that later) across a range from roughly 1800-1960. Most importantly, it offers specific takes on short fiction, a form that usually gets acknowledged but rarely gets rigorous treatment (outside of this book, the other great resources for critical writing on supernatural short fiction are The Penguin Encyclopedia of Horror and the Supernatural & St. James Guide to Horror, Ghost & Gothic Writers). For a dedicated list maker like me, it proved a bounty of information to add to my lists. If you are a casual reader of horror & supernatural fiction, you can probably skip it, but if you have an interest in the field as a whole, and enjoy reading things from a range of time, it's a great resource. In other words, this is a good way of figuring out whether a particular story or novel is worth your time

Bleiler, like myself, seems to be a "Generalist" in his critical approach. The material covered here ranges from the Gothic novel, Fantasy novels, the classic "English Ghost Story" and the like. Essentially, "Supernatural" means we get a lot of "other" stuff than just "scary"/horror fiction - Reincarnation fantasies, Fantasy novels, Fairy stories, Religious Extrapolations, Sentimental Ghost tales, etc. This also means that another strand of the "scary"/horror genre is ignored - the conte cruel, stories of violence, monster stories that are rooted in the natural world, etc. If you want a good reference - a lot of Edgar Allan Poe stories are omitted because, for example, is there anything decidedly "supernatural" about "The Telltale Heart"?

And, yeah, Bleiler seems to have exactly the critical tastes that a project like this needs - flexible, but able to spot crap and be blunt about it, while leaving the door open for a range of responses. There are occasional entries where he expresses opinions that go against the "accepted", at least in general, but it's been so long since reading it that I can't specifically name them. It's just a very good resource, is what it comes down to - there's even a motif index (as a former Anthropology student, I recognized and welcomed this concept) which allows you to access the mass of data from different angles (want to know what specific stories/novels have vampires? Howabaout mermaids? Howabout prophetic dreams?). There's even a supplement where Bleiler lays out a "phenomenology" of supernatural fiction (a bit too academic for my tastes) and argues that the term "supernatural" should be retired (as it implies "above" or "beyond" nature, and arises from religious/metaphysical conceits) and replaced with "contranatural" - well, THAT didn't happen but it's a good point (it reminds me of that 30s/40s attempt to introduce the term "supernormal", which also met with no success).

Reading this whole book, I'll also admit, was frustrating and sad. Because, in truth, it almost demands the further creation of two volumes that will never be published. The first would be a parallel volume examining "non-supernatural" fiction of the same type (I'm at a loss of what to call it) that examines in the same style and format: Romanticism, the Frenetique movement, non-supernatural Gothics, Sensation Fiction, Penny Dreadfuls/Blood & Thunder pamphlets, Suspense fiction, Decadent fiction, the Conte Cruel, Dime Novels, Pulp fiction, etc. The second would be a continuation of Bleiler, covering 1960 until current times. Why will they never be written - well, I'm too old, don't have the resources and no one would pay me what it would take to do the work. We can only hope some bookish, critical, well-read child of wealthy parents reads this review at the right age and has the financial resources to start work down the right path, which would likely end in self-publication....we can only hope.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.