Belt Buckle Backs

This post is a little different from my usual ones about books, bikes, or cakes.

I was recently looking at buying a vintage belt buckle online, and became fascinated with the designs that can be found on the reverse of them.

These are parts of the objects not seen by anyone apart from the wearer, yet they were often complex, creative, and imaginative, but why are they there?

Taking time to add detail to a part of an object that would not be seen is nothing new. As my good friend and archaeologist Trix pointed out, this can be seen on brooches going back to the early medieval period.

One idea is having intricate elements that don’t form the main part of the buckle act as a copyright system to protect against fraud.

The modern belt buckle collecting trend dates back to the late sixties and early seventies, with buckles by firms such as Tiffany & Co. turning up secondhand. Supposedly dating to the late 19th and early 20th century, these became incredibly sought out by collectors. Information was scant until the publication of Tiffany & Gaylord Express & Exhibition Belt Plates by Percy Seibert.

However it was soon discovered that the book was fabricated to sell fake buckles, and is a fascinating read. You can find the full story here https://www.beltbucklehistory.com/1970s-history

With such a history in the industry, it comes as no surprise firms might want to protect their designs, and the best way of doing this is the hidden elephant approach. Let me explain. In 1923 a group of British surveyors working on the Gold coast (now Ghana) drew a contour in the shape of an elephant (https://bigthink.com/strange-maps/670-nil-how-to-hide-an-elephant-the-1923-gold-coast-survey/). There are several possible explanations such as boredom and laziness, but the one relevant here is that the hidden detail could be used to prove whether a map had been copied from the 1923 version without permission.

I wonder if the details on the back of the belt buckles works the same but in reverse. Presumably anyone interested in making copies of the buckles would concentrate on the front, so any buckles without the reverse detail would be a fake. Even if an aspiring counterfeiter did replicate the reverse, the details are often fine, so the act of creating a mould from an example buckle would mean the sharpness and clarity would be lost.

Below are the buckles in my own collection, including buckles that have no detail on the reverse. (Click on the photos to see them in more detail.)

This Harley design I first spotted online is the one that renewed my interest in buckles.

At the top you can see the Bergamot seal, highly intricate and difficult to recast. In the centre of the buckle there is the Bergamot copyright plaque, as well as the ‘MADE IN USA’ panel. However, I want to point out something that might not be so obvious at first glance. The clamp holding the swivel on the left hand side is decorated with leaves, as is the base of the pin. These ornate patterns would not be seen when worn, but add detail that make the buckle distinctive.

This is the oldest buckle in my collection, bought at the Cactus Trading Post on Gillygate in York. In the centre of the reverse is the Dragon Designs – Tanside England emblem, with the Tanside Limited panel below, and beneath that the Norton Licensed product statement. However, if you look at the clamp holding the swivel in place, this has a ‘leaf’ design reminiscent of that seen on the Bergamot buckle above. While they seem to be separate companies, Tanside do sell Bergamot buckles, and I wonder if this influence the use of the leaf design on their buckles.

This brass Indian Larry buckle shows that not all cast buckles have such detail on the reverse. This was bought at a bike rally and features the company logo for Indian Larry Motorcycles https://indianlarry.com/

This C&J belt buckle features some familiar features, with the company panel, copyright and date tag, design number, and a made in USA shield. However, it’s the clamps for the swivel that are particularly interesting here, with the swivel held in place by two eagle heads. This buckle is so patriotic, I have to store it in apple pie and a cowboy hat…

Full confession. This vintage Baron Brass Buckles panhead chop buckle is probably my favourite, even though the reverse is fairly plain, with the BBB diamond, registered trademark symbol, and ‘SOLID BRASS BARON BUCKLE’ embossed above the model number. It’s so well done, and has the heft a proper buckle should do.

This Bergamot buckle design from the 1980s has all the things we would expect; the Bergamot seal, the ‘MADE IN U.S.A.’ declaration, the leaves holding both the swivel and the pin. However it also has prose, describing the feeling of riding a motorbike out on the long open roads of America. These little details all contribute to the distinctiveness of the buckle, and give it a little more detail that cannot be easily replicated.

This buckle was bought as a gift, and bears none of the detail on the back, but I love it, with the boar obviously having a great time missioning on in the grass.

Mobtown Chicago, from The Alley in Chicago, have made some highly creative designs over the years, and this imaginative style continues on the back of the buckles. As can be seen from this monster buckle, the reverse features bullets to carry the copyright info, and dice to hold the swivel in place. However, I couldn’t make out what the other part of the clamp was. I also couldn’t tell what the pin was. Both are much clearer on the buckle below.

As you should be able to see on the reverse of this astronaut buckle, the pin and clamp are made from a cobra.

You can watch a video of Mobtown pewter buckles being cast below.

This Johnny Cash buckle is included here for completeness, again showing that not all buckles have intricate details on the back, even when the front is detailed. (Yes, it is a bit weird having a memorial buckle to a dead musician, and no, I don’t care…)

However, this Johnny Cash buckle (I like Johnny Cash), is more interesting on the reverse.

Here the back of the Rumble59 buckle is fairly plain, apart from the last verse from Cash’s 1971 song The Man In Black. I don’t know if anyone has ever used it to crib the lyrics at karaoke, but it adds an nice little detail to the buckle.

In case you think these little details on the buckles is a thing of the past, here’s a more recent buckle from Vince Ray (by recent I mean since the millennium). As you might expect it shows the Vince Ray logo, but also has three skulls holding the swivel in place, and a skull and crossbones with the pin emerging from the mouth.

This is a little look at the buckles I currently own, but there may well be a part two when I next go on Vinted with money burning a hole in my pocket.

Kaffee (und Kuchen) Racer 11 – Our Market

Homemade is often the best, right? Handmade too. I think this is where my love of custom motorbikes and love of cake intersects. For me, the joy of customs and chops is seeing all the work that goes into them. The way the owners and builders can tell you the history of a part or the story of how much of a challenge it was to get that part to fit. (Buy me a coffee and I’ll bore you for hours about fitting the new exhaust to my Harley, constantly repairing the old petrol tank on my Norton, or finding a sprocket for my old GPZ hardtail).

Similarly, there is something special about homemade cakes in a café.

That philosophy of handmade and homemade sits at the heart of Our Market, and their community café Kunterbunt (or Colourful).

I’d been in Selbitz the day before to get my biannual TÜV done on the Harley at the local GTÜ, and remembered I had been intending to visit Our Market and sample the cake there.

Our Market is a shop on the edge of Selbitz that sells many wonderful things to take home, such as beautiful metal plaques of trees, wooden jewellery, and felt flowers. It’s a place full of beautiful objects, displaying great skill, and it has a café!

Decorated with photos of Selbitz, the café is cozy and friendly. Rather than a huge range of cakes, Kunterbunt has a more limited offering, but that doesn’t stop them being tasty (and means I don’t spend ten minutes trying to decide what I’m going to eat on this visit, and what I’m going to enjoy next time). On this visit, the cake on offer was a Far Breton cake, with a custard filling in a pastry crust.

The coffee is also excellent, and the whole place has a really nice and welcoming feeling. All the cake and the cake is free, with Our Market/Kunterbunt just asking for a donation.

Throughout the week, there are regular meetings, including a crafting group and a German/English language exchange. The word community gets thrown around a lot these days, whether we’re trying to create it or mourning the loss of it, but Our Market is actively working to build a sense of community, by providing a lovely place where people of different backgrounds and experiences can meet to chat and get to know each other better.

Also, before I sign off, I’ve got to also mention the beautiful mosaic at the entrance, which really gives a sense of the delight that awaits within.

If you’re passing through (or have to get your motorbike tested at the GTÜ), I’d highly recommend stopping by for coffee and cake. I can’t say for sure what will be available, but I am sure it will be tasty, and the welcome will be warm.

Our Market/Kunterbunt

Hofer Str. 3a, Selbitz, Germany, 95152

https://www.facebook.com/ourmarket.de

https://www.facebook.com/selbitzkunterbunt

Monday 10:00 – 17:00

Tuesday 14:00 – 17:00

Wednesday 14:00 – 17:00

Thursday 14:00 – 17:00

Friday 10:00 – 17:00

Saturday CLOSED

Sunday CLOSED

The Best Weird Fiction of the Year – Volume 2

I’ve been a huge admirer of Undertow Publishing since I first discovered them. Over the years, they have published some of my favourite authors, including Priya Sharma and Laura Mauro. I was thrilled to have my own collection, To Drown in Dark Water, published by Undertow in 2021

Last year, Michael Kelly published Best Weird Fiction of the Year Volume 1, filling a void left in the publishing landscape since Undertow’s Year’s Best Weird Fiction series came to an end.

You will be unsurprised to hear I was over the moon to find out my story ‘Pollen’ will be reprinted in The Best Weird Fiction of the Year Volume 2.

Pollen first appeared in Tales of Occult Britain, edited by Maria J Pérez Cuervo, a book by Hellebore that acts as a companion to The Hellebore Guide to Occult Britain. (You can grab a copy here, and I highly recommend you do https://helleborezine.com/collections/occult-britain)

Pollen is set on Lindisfarne, featuring the Lindisfarne Helleborine orchid, and is about drowned landscapes, loss, and isolation.

Just a look at the table of contents for The Best Weird Fiction of the Year Volume 2 shows what good taste Michael has, with Nathan Ballingrud, John Langan, Lynda. E. Rucker, Alison Littlewood, Brian Evenson, and Kay Chronister, all featuring alongside many writers who are new to me, so I’m thrilled to be in such good company.

Here’s the unsettling cover for the new anthology, and you can pre-order a copy at the link here (https://undertowpublications.com/shop/best-weird-fiction-two), because future you deserves a gift.

Kaffee (und Kuchen) Racer 10 – Café Vetter am Klinikum

The keen-eyed among you are probably thinking, “Haven’t you already written one of these about Café Vetter? Have you run out of cafés to write about? This series of posts would be much better with tasting samples.”

In answer, yes, no, and absolutely (of the cakes, not the motorbikes. The motorbikes don’t taste as nice as the cakes).

Café Vetter has indeed appeared here, and considering how often we visit, it would be fairly fitting to write about it a second time. However, this is not the same place. this is Café Vetter am Klinikum.

While the main Café Vetter is in the centre of Hof, the smaller, more compact Café Vetter am Klinikum is on the edge of town, next to the Sana Klinikum Hospital.

In the interests of science, I felt it necessary to see just how this version of Café Vetter measured up to our regular haunt.

Unsurprisingly, it measured up very well.

I’m going to blame the distraction of wonderful cake, leading to me forgetting to note down the exact type.

I think it was called Tartufo Torte.

To be honest, I pointed at what looked tasty and asked for a slice.

The cake consisted of nuts, chocolate, sponge, and cream, with a pastry base, decorated with half a Ferrero Rocher style truffle. To be fair, it didn’t last long, before I’d finished it, drank the accompanying cappuccino, and had to head back to the office, my curiosity satisfied, and my faith in the high standard of Café Vetter’s cakes maintained.

If you are looking for somewhere to enjoy high quality cake outside the centre of Hof, or, if you have to go to the neighbouring hospital and need to cheer yourself up, I recommend this compact, quality, little sibling in the Café Vette family.

Café Vetter am Klinikum, Eppenreuther Str. 28, 95032 Hof

Project Repoman – 18 Five Easy Pieces

Five Easy Pieces is another film where the Moviedrome introduction doesn’t seem easily available, so here is a transcript.

Five Easy Pieces is an American film that was made in 1970 by BBS, Bert Schneider’s production company. Schneider had been the producer of Easy Rider, made the previous year. Five Easy Pieces was directed by Bob Rafelson, who had had a hand in the editing of Easy Rider, and it stars Jack Nicholson who, of course, played the Southern lawyer in Easy Rider. Both films were shot by Laszlo Kovacs. Like Easy RiderFive Easy Pieces is a road movie of sorts, but unlike the motorcycle film, which is a pretty epic thing about the big themes, Five Easy Pieces is very intimate and understated.
It’s very rare for an American film to tell a story about the class system. The hero Bobby (Nicholson) is a man who has rejected his family, who are wealthy artists, and chosen to become a member of the proletariat. That sounds a little pompous, but it is a phenomenon that has affected artists from George Orwell to William Burroughs. It’s all the more pointed because American cinema at this time (the 1960s and 1970s) really did tend to exalt the working classes – just look at the characters played by Dennis Hopper and Peter Fonda in Easy Rider and by Nicholson in One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest and The Last Detail – whereas today it glorifies the bourgeoisie.
The Americans really used to make great films, and this is one of them. It has a fantastic script, great performances and a famous restaurant scene.”

I went into this one knowing nothing really about it, beyond knowing Jack Nicholson starred in the main role as Bobby. The opening scenes are a work of art, showing Nicholson labouring on an oilfield, When dusk falls, Tammy Wynette’s voice soundtracks the title sequence, before it becomes diegetic, playing on the record player as Bobby walks into the house he shares with Rayette. Watching, I thought the beginning was especially strong because it told us who Bobby was without telling us. In this, I was totally wrong.

It becomes clear while Bobby and his friend Elton are stuck in a traffic jam, Bobby has talents he keeps to himself. Bored and drunk, he jumps on a flat-bed truck and starts playing the piano. It’s only really in the second half that we get a true sense of Bobby’s background and the tension between his upbringing, and his musical ability, and the person he wants to be.

Talent is a strange thing. Recently, we watched Queen of Chess, about Judit Polgár, and Angels of Dirt focussing on flat tracker Charlotte Kainz. Both these women have immense talent in their chosen field, though whether Polgár would have had the interest in pursuing it without the relentless routine imposed by her father is a question that lies at the heart of Queen of Chess.

I think there is a similar situation with Bobby, who has been raised by musicians, has talent, but has no interest in pursuing it, and just wants to live his life with all the chaos that brings. Yet, even though he turns to this world he’s not from, Rayette bores him, and he is always looking for something else, whether that is with other women or in the bottom of a bottle.

The scene where Bobby talks to his father in the field, is incredibly powerful and shows how good Nicholson already was as an actor.

There are also several moments when you can see that nervous pent up rage he would channel for the role of Jack Torrance in The Shining.

Bobby is not a hero, or an anti-hero, and Nicholson plays him as neither of those. Instead he finds the discomfort of a man who doesn’t want to remain in the life he was born into, but can’t find a place for himself elsewhere in the world.

The gas station scene at the end of the film, where for two minutes the camera holds the same position, is a fantastic way to finish this poignant story of some rebelling against the life laid out for him, to find he doesn’t fit in anywhere else.

In some ways Five Easy Pieces echoes earlier films in this season, like Big Wednesday and Fat City, about people who don’t quite feel comfortable in the world they find themselves in and don’t have the skills to resolve and change that.

In his introduction, Cox mentions the role of people from Easy Rider in five Easy Pieces. However, this also includes the appearance of Toni Basil who appeared in the iconic biker film, and a similar feel to the poster of the earlier movie, although we see Fonda. Both seem as if they are looking for something in the myth of America, though they are looking in different directions, figuratively and literally.

This is the last film, in season one, and I’ll be taking a little break before starting season 2. I hope you’ve find these posts interesting, and I hope some of them have led you to go back to this eclectic and strange collection of films, expertly curated by Alex Cox.

Project Repoman – 17 The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

The Good, The Bad and The Ugly is one of those films that looms large in my childhood memories. Like Dirty Harry, I was certain I had seen bits of it when my Dad had been watching (the pillow scene, the final graveyard scene), but didn’t remember watching the whole film. However, on this rewatch I realised I must have seen the full thing at some point.

I also hadn’t realised until after I finished the film this time that it was the third in the trilogy, and that Blondie is meant to be the same character from the two Dollars films. This is important, and I’ll explain in minute.

For the first ten minutes of The Good, The Bad and The Ugly, there is no dialogue, with the first words coming from Stevens when Angel Eyes is about to interrogate him over the location of the man now using the name Bill Carson. There’s a silence and an emptiness to the landscape and the locations that Morricone’s soundtrack only intensifies.

Lee Van Cleef as Angel Eyes is a chilling villain. He has a really unsettling presence about him, and that comes across on the screen. In a film where silence and space in dialogue plays a big role, Van Cleef is a master, and the scene with the pillow and Baker is one of those that got under my skin as a kid and still unnerves me to this day.

This brings me to the subject of whose story we are being told. Without doubt Blondie, The Man With No Name, is the character linking all three films in the trilogy. However, as the Mad Max films show (which I believe was influenced my Leone’s westerns), the person who is the connecting tissue is not necessarily who the story is about. While Clint Eastwood’s character draws a line through all three films, this, to me, is Tuco’s story.

For me, the start of the film is the prologue with Angel Eyes, setting up the premise of the film. Then we follow Tuco from when he is first ambushed in an isolated, abandoned, farmstead, to the end of the film when he is stood on the cross with a noose around his neck. Tuco is the only one we get any real kind of backstory with, when we meet his brother at the monastery.

Tuco is an interesting character. When I remembered the film before rewatching, I pictured him as the annoying sidekick, incompetent and irritating. While he burbles, and is the bait for the scam he pulls with Blondie, he is an efficient killer in his own right and very shrewd throughout the film.

There’s also a lot humour, for example in one of the key scenes where Blondie and Tuco are dressed as confederate soldiers and see grey clad cavalry in the distance, who turn out to be union soldiers covered in road dust.

Talking about clothes, I also have to give a quick nod to the very fancy shirt Blondie is wearing when we first meet him.

While this is a buried treasure story, it is also very good at showing the brutality and pointlessness of war, with the portrayal of trench warfare, and the endless battle for the bridge. An objective neither side is willing to demolish, instead throwing soldiers forward to fight on, with neither side making progress and just taking casualties. Little details enforce this brutality like the wound packing on the alcoholic captain.

The impact of the war is reflected in the size of the cemetery at the end, rippling out in ever increasing circles of graves.

There are two other characters worth mentioning.

The first is the soundtrack by Morricone. Like many soundtracks (for example Twin Peaks), the music lives in my memory a lot more than the story. Here it is such a powerful presence in every scene, and when it drops away it leaves a really powerful void, filled with the silence of the desert.

Which brings me to the landscape.

As with a lot of westerns, the landscape is powerful character in its own right. Filmed in Spain, but representing the American landscape, it reminded me of a technique in Psychogeography of navigating one territory with the map of another. I think there would be an interesting exploration to do here, around Spanish Civil War locations compared to those of the American Civil War.

Returning to Mad Max, the places in The Good, The Bad and The Ugly have that same pre-apocalypse feel present in the first of George Miller’s films. Towns just teetering on the edge of failing, or being deserted because people know what is coming. In many westerns I’ve seen (not a huge number, I grant you), a lot of the narrative feels like it is about pushing forward into new territories (the apocalypse is happening to other communities). Here it feels like retreat and abandonment, and this leaves space for people like Angel Eyes, Tuco, and Blondie to flourish.

To finish, I want to say that The Good, The Bad and The Ugly has one of the best final sequences in cinema, and the graveyard scene as a whole holds up to this day. A real high point of this project so far.

Project Repoman 16 – The Man Who Fell To Earth

Here is Alex Cox’s introduction, but the quality is rough to say the least, so I’m including the transcript below.

This British science-fiction movie was made in the United States in 1976. It stars David Bowie, Candy Clarke, Rip Torn and Buck Henry – all excellent. Bowie plays an alien trapped on earth, and I think it’s his best acting work. The Man Who Fell to Earth is based on a fine novel by Walter Tevis, who also wrote The Hustler.
The film was directed by Nicolas Roeg who is, I think, of all the British film directors at work today, probably the most interesting and the best. He’s also the only film director who’s had a rock ‘n’ roll song written in his honour (it’s on Big Audio Dynamite’s first album). Roeg is not one of those reclusive geniuses who only makes a great work once every seven years; he’s productive and diverse. His films include Don’t Look Now, Performance, Insignificance, Eureka, Castaway and Track 29.
He started out as a cinematographer and worked for Roger Corman – he shot The Masque of the Red Death. His most interesting aspect, however, is not the visual one, although visually his films are very good. It’s the editorial: his films are structurally very complex and convoluted. Watching one is rather like watching six or seven televisions in a row, each of them transmitting a different story. This means that, on a first viewing, Roeg’s films are hard to follow but, if you persist, you will be rewarded. Rather like a fine wine, his films improve with age.

If you’re going to cast someone as a slightly confused otherworldly alien in the 1970s, then David Bowie is probably your go to. Yet, even from the opening scene, it’s clear that the earthlings are just as strange. In some ways, like many films in Moviedrome, this has a theme about an America that never existed.

It’s not an easy film to follow. No-one disputes that. A series of vignettes about the existence of Thomas Jerome Newton as he navigates life on earth, while building up a corporation, amassing vast wealth and becoming an alcoholic. There’s a lovely scene near the beginning of the film where he goes into a shop to sell his wife’s ring, then is shown later with hundreds of identical rings, and roll upon roll of hundred dollar bills.

The main storyline is to do with Newton needing water for his drought stricken planet, yet that was, to me, in the background. The main theme seems to be how someone who doesn’t show human emotions can function in society.

The supporting characters are excellent. Mary-Lou reminds me of Oma from Fat City, and Bryce a little of Tully in the same film.

When you look at the creative talent behind the creation of this film, with Walter Tevis providing the original novel (better known these days for The Queen’s Gambit, but also behind The Color of Money and The Hustler), and Nicolas Roeg who also directed Don’t Look Now, with Bowie very much at the centre, then this was going to end up an odd film.

One thing that surprised me was how explicit The Man Who Fell To Earth was, and it doesn’t surprise me that it is Roeg who was behind the filming. Like Don’t Look Now, the sex shown is raw and emotional, even when Bryce is sleeping with his students. There is also a very odd sex scene between Newton and Mary-Lou intercut with bodies covered in some type of grease.

Alcoholism and loss seem to sit at the centre of the story, and there is definitely an echo in Netwton’s continued alcoholism at the end, with the drunk he sees at the beginning, as well as ideas about how the nature of earth will corrupt even him.

With Roeg’s background in cinematography, particularly films like Corman’s Masque of the Red Death, there is no surprise that the colour work is excellent, unsettling, and like looking at a series of oddly faded photos. This is really noticeable when Newton and Mary-Lou go to the lake-house, with his vibrant red hair, and her colourful outfits (the yellow and black one reminding me of Kill Bill).

True to the Moviedrome spirit, I watched this late on a Sunday night, not fully awake, and I’m not sure I got every nuance of the story, but it is visually impressive, Bowie is sublime and as alien as Bowie in the seventies could be, and the film contains a lot of my favourite elements of seventies films.

Project Repoman 15 – One From the Heart

Alex Cox’s introduction for One From the Heart isn’t available to watch, so I’ve put the transcript below.

One from the Heart was the first film Coppola made after Apocalypse Now. I think that this was, in a sense, his attempt to come down after creating that enormous epic, which took a lot of energy and several years of production – making instead a small, intimate story about two people and what happens when you try to cheat on your boyfriend or girlfriend.
It is set in Las Vegas, but it was all filmed on the sound stages of Coppola’s Zoetrope Studios in Hollywood. Zoetrope was a noble attempt to recreate an old-style studio system for the benefit of creative people: in the two years that Coppola owned Zoetrope, before he had to let it go for lack of money, Gene Kelly, Wim Wenders and Jean-Luc Godard all worked there. Zoetrope may have been a noble endeavour, but it was also the reason why One from the Heart doesn’t entirely work. There are two things at war in the film. One is the very simple romantic story and the other is the grandiose element; the $25 million budget, the elaborate sets, the big special-effect dance numbers and the awful songs.
It’s not that songs by Tom Waits and Crystal Gayle are bad in themselves; it’s only that when you see a man walking upstairs, tripping on an item of a woman’s clothing, picking it up, looking at it, frowning and carrying on walking, you don’t need to hear a voice on the soundtrack singing: ‘I’m sick and tired of picking up after you.’ It’s sort of overkill.
Coppola had to wait a little while longer before he could make a small, cheap film that was really satisfying – that was Rumblefish. But One from the Heart is interesting. All Coppola’s films are interesting. The man can’t make a totally useless movie.

This is an odd film, but not the way a lot of films in Moviedrome are odd. Although it cannot be called Lynchian in any way, for me it occupies that same slightly hallucinogenic place in the imagination. It’s a place filled with the imagery of what America should be, but never is. This is captured here with the contrast between the imagery of the Vegas bright lights, and the undercutting by the Tom Waits soundtrack.

I saw this described as a musical, and it does contain some of the set pieces you would expect, such as the dance numbers (one that looks straight off Soul Train), but differs in that none of the cast sing the songs projecting their feelings. The use of colour is astounding, and the way the shots transition between Franny and Hank is handled really well, whether that is by projecting the one onto the bedroom wall while the other gets ready, or the way they pass each other in the street.

However, in the end it feels like a tragedy. The relationship isn’t healthy, and I don’t think that’s just looking back at previous portrayals of romantic relationships in film with modern eyes. There is a cycle of aggression and making up that is just going to continue, and when Franny returns to Hank at the end of the film, it feels like she’s giving up. I’m not sure whether Ray and Leila would have been any more healthy for Franny and Hank respectively, but they might have helped them break the cycle, instead of doubling down on something that wasn’t working. The only ones who seem to end positively are Maggie and Moe, though we don’t see the conclusion of that relationship.

The film was all shot on the Zoetrope sound stage, and that fits perfectly with the theme of the film. It’s all scenery, confined, and created, and within that people try and live their lives, but find things sour and circle around relationships and situations that aren’t healthy.

There is a particular genre of film that seems to deal with the American Dream. Of course a lot of Lynch’s work is like that, and Easy Rider very much so. This feels similar, even if it never was intended to be, and there is a sadness here, with Tom Waits perfectly suited to soundtrack the couple not going for what they want.

The Bikes From NEL – The Bikers By Alex Stuart

Introduction

New English Library biker books often get cast as one thing, being of a type, but there is a lot of variation in the stories they tell.

Some are simply exploitation stories, very much in the same tradition as the skinhead books, also published by NEL. Others are dystopian, while some claim to be reportage, either of the history of clubs in the US or the bike club scene in England.

My personal tastes run to those that have a dystopian feel (the Mick Norman books particularly), or an occult element to the story.

With that in mind, The Bikers by Alex Stuart (aka Alex R. Stuart, aka Richard A Gordon), may seem like a strange choice to feature here. The Bikers is not an occult story. There are no ancient priests or forgotten gods. No-one is trying to perform rituals at Stonehenge, and none of the bikes are cursed (not obviously, anyway).

In many ways, The Bikers, although fictional, is contemporary reportage, or at least elements of it are. We’ll get to that in a moment. But, while I don’t have to justify why I like the Little Billy trilogy, I want to understand why, and I think it has a lot to do with the tone and the way Alex Stuart creates atmosphere.

The Bikers is written by Alex Stuart, who also wrote for NEL as Alex R. Stuart. The Bikers predates The Devil’s Rider, the previous book of his I’ve featured here. As mentioned in that article, Richard A. Gordon added the R. to his pseudonym following complaints from Violet Vivian Stuart who wrote historical novels as Alex Stuart (the world of pen names can get very complicated).

It’s worth looking at my previous article here, to get a feel for the other work Gordon wrote, and how that had an influence on The Devil’s Rider (https://stevetoase.wordpress.com/2022/06/14/the-devils-rider/)

The Bikers – First Appearance of The Apostles

The Bikers is a bit of a different beast, but the writing has the same stream of consciousness, descriptive beauty as the later book.

— The Hanger Lane underpass on the roaring Oxford Road, Western Avenue heading slategrey out of Park Royal in North-West London, on a hot summer day —

— Thirty mean-looking motorbikes straddled and impelled by thirty dirty mean-looking Apostles with enough sleazy wind-whipped mamas to go round every last one of them —

— They’re the Shoreditch Chapter, broken away from the East London Hell’s Angels, and they’re bursting in full feral Festival bound formation, from the shadows beneath the sterile concrete under pass — every last one of them stoned out of his righteous mind, higher than the white clouds in the glazing baking sky —

Stuart starts The Bikers, by locating the scene so effectively (something he also did in The Devil’s Rider), and the introduction of The Apostles as a presence in contrast to the sterility of the city. What I really love, though, is the poetry of the language. “…full feral Festival bound formation…shadows beneath the sterile concrete underpass…glazing baking sky

Stuart wastes no time in focusing in on the action, again a feature of New English Library youth subculture books in general and Stuart’s writing in particular. We’re with The Apostles on a run, and then everything goes very wrong. Someone underestimates them, cuts them up on a sports bike, and incurs their wrath.

Although we don’t meet him yet, this is where the central tension in the club is set up, the one that lies at the heart of all the other conflicts in the book; the rivalry between Larry the Lamb, the acting pres of The Apostles, and Little Billy, the real, though absent, president.

These tensions spiral out to the public in their cars “like good citizens all hoping for the two toned sirens of one-toned justice to wail in pursuit”, to the wider country and establishment. The rider of the Super Hawk, who challenges them, comes to represent the straight world trying to put down the bikers, and that means, in the world of the story, he needs to be wiped out.

The fallout from this, with burning cars, dead riders, and the spectre of the police about to start pursuit, sets the rest of the events of the story in motion. With no other plan, Larry the Lamb leads the rest of the Apostles on toward the festival.

For me, The Bikers differs from a lot of the NEL books, because the central setting, the music festival, is based on a real event. More of that in a bit. First, let’s talk about Little Billy.

Alex Stuart doesn’t mince his words. He wants us to see Little Billy as a nightmare in human form. Rather than summarise, I’m going to quote Stuart’s description verbatim.

“Little Billy was born an Apostle, a speeding, rampaging monster. He’s huge and dirty and covered with hair, and what little is visible of his face is enough to freak the minds of half the world’s population.

But when he’s astride his roaring Harley-Davidson 74, he’s a crude monster no more but a graceful elemental carnivore. He leans into the hurricane wind, arched up and across his apehangers. His right arm runs from elbow down along the gleaming right apehanger, his fingers curling lazily over the dial of the speedometer.

But his arm’s stiff on the left bar. The stump welded to the gleaming metal forearm, which curls slowly into the long rake of double-pronged claws. These take the place of his left hand. The tips of either claw point at where his palm was till the day the shearing rival outlaw axe parted him from the company of his hand and all but two inches of forearm.”

In the North of England, there was a very well known outlaw biker, active from the mid sixties, who did have a prosthetic arm with claws (I’m not going to name them here, but if you’ve spent any time around bikers in that part of the country, you probably know who). Normally I would think that an author has invented his characters completely. In this case I’ve often wondered if Stuart took inspiration from this particular person, especially as the main events of The Bikers is inspired by a real event.

Siddhartha, rock bands, and Hermann Hesse

After blowing the minds of the custom officers, and regaining possession of his bike, Little Billy, rides to nearby Bristol, where he, in quick succession, stocks up on drugs, pulls two girls, and has a fight with some local youths that he effortlessly wins. Following a fairly chaste threesome in a field with the two girls, Billy finds out the band Siddhartha are going to be playing at the festival, and, realising The Apostles wouldn’t miss such an event, makes the decision to ride there and hook up with his club.

Siddhartha always amused me. In these stories, as with many of the NEL books, there are lots of little in-jokes. Siddhartha is a book by Hermann Hesse, as is Steppenwolf, and Steppenwolf the band performed Born to be Wild on the Easy Rider soundtrack.

Siddhartha’s song titles in the book seem to be a nod to another band, heavily connected with British bikers, with International Freedom Farout Fighter and Brainlit Wipeout, sounding like a nod to Hawkwind’s Urban Guerrilla and Brainbox Pollution (released on the same 7 inch in 1973).

Now, I might be wrong on this, as my edition of the Bikers is from 1975 which is two years after the single came out, but the original edition of The Bikers came out in 1971. Maybe it was just a coincidence, or maybe it was revised for the later edition.

British Country Pubs in the Seventies

One key scene in the book, and one that perfectly sums up both the relationship between the youth subcultures of the time and the tensions in the book, happens when The Apostles are trying to reach the festival and get stuck at a pub five miles from the festival grounds.

Chapter four opens with a great description.

“Old Manny Cutler, wrinkled like a dried brown kipper, is wedged in a corner of the beige button-cushioned benchseats running around the oaken wall of the Green Man’s public bar. He’s shrouded by the shadow of the Somersetshire light falling through the bottled panes of the tight box windows.

The Green Man was once a coaching inn, later it was a free-house. Right now it’s a dusted air-conditioned juke-boxed country laneside outlet for a London brewery, the owners of which would never dare drink their own beer.”

The Green Man is the pub in mist at the crossroads, used by locals, visited by townsfolk, and sometimes ‘invaded’ by bikers. I remember seeing these places in books like the Usbourne Mysteries of the Unknown that might have been the location of a gibbet or a long forgotten murder, passing into myth. You can see public houses like this in the Murdersville episode of The Avengers.

And this was the time of “No bikers” signs put up to discourage the patronage of motorbike riders.

Again, Stuart excels at descriptions of heat.

“The lane is bordered by parched hedgerows, beyond which grows sorry-looking barley in loose and overfarmed topsoil. The nettles in the ditch already bear a blasted appearance, the grass is without sap. The blazing broiling pearl sky overhead is dry, a haze of stale air. Visibility is limited in all directions to about three miles.”

And into this ancient inn and scorched landscape come The Apostles.

This is not the social media fed landscape we are familiar with now. Instead, information arrives in radio news broadcasts, slightly ahead of the arrival of The Apostles themselves.

The bikers have not had an easy time getting this far, only their manoeuvrability helping them evade the police through the festival traffic.

While it might be thought the bikers are natural allies of the festival goers, they are different enough to not sit comfortably with the rest of the counter culture here. Nor are they part of the wider society. This is shown clearly as the Apostles move into the pub and encounter the landlord, with his muttonchops, who has tried and failed to call the forces of law and order.

When it becomes clear The Apostles have no intention of paying for their drinks, he challenges them, a challenge that sees him throttled, and released to show them the hospitality they expect. Glasses are smashed, the jukebox is taken over, and people are fornicating on the benches. This is no longer the 1970s timeless British pub, where Old Manny Cutler can spend his final days safely in his corner. This is a place of anarchy and violence, more likely to be seen in the cities than in the endless summer of the British countryside that never really existed.

The counter culture is not a monolith and, again, this is something Stuart is very good at portraying.

Dan Lewin is part of the counter culture, but rather than being the unleashed rage represented by The Apostles, he is a far more reasoned voice, an intellectual side – a person who overstepped the mark in Ulster, attracting the attention of the Security Forces, and has also written articles about The Apostles. He is someone who knows how thin the line he is treading is, but can see the way the situation is spiralling out of control.

Lewin is not a gonzo journalist. This is not Hunter S Thompson opening his apartment to the Oakland Angels. Lewin is calmer and more reasoned. He knows the heat The Apostles are bringing down on themselves. On them all. And he confronts Larry the Lamb, explains the situation he’s in, “Don’t you realise you’ve slapped the British Lion right in the face?” Then, when Larry asks him from the solution, he tells him the unpalatable truth.

“You must remove your colours, you can’t jam it through this traffic advertising it to every citizen just who you are!”

Unsurprisingly, this causes tensions in The Apostles. The idea of dropping their colours is seen as a coward’s way out, even by those who regard it as the best option. Wildcat leads a faction on bikes, still flying their colours, while Larry the Lamb remains behind, and then a further split between those who decide to stay with their bikes and those who choose to press on to the festival. Carolyn, Dan Lewin’s girlfriend, curses the way the festival has brought bubbling tensions to a head, and knows what effect the Apostles could have amongst the festival goers. When the publican succumbs to his wounds, she turns to Dan and says “Let the dead bury the dead.”

The Isle of Wight Festival

Here, Stuart changes the focus to the festival, and this is where we start to get into more contemporary events.

In the book, the festival is held on the British mainland, somewhere in the south-west, but it soon becomes clear that the inspiration for the event Alex Stuart writes about is the Isle of Wight festival.

The Isle of Wight Festival in 1970 was a huge affair, held in the August of that year on the western side of the Island. During the previous two festivals held on the Isle of Wight, the organisers were able to negotiate a location with the landowners, but due to pressure from local communities, the festival location was brought under the planning system. This meant the only site available to the organisers was East Afton Farm, Afton Down. This had consequences for the festival, most notably giving a hill where people could gather and watch the bands for free. Also, the Hells Angels were in attendance.

This was a significant time in the history of the club. Two British bikers, Buttons and Harley Pete, had gone over to the US to get permission for official charters in the UK. Once they were back, they had to confront the presence of unchartered, unofficial clubs using the Hells Angels name. A major faction of these clubs, who were friends and supported each other, were known as ‘the amalgamation’ in contrast to the official ‘All England’ represented by the officially sanctioned charters.

While the history of this time is not mine to tell, what is clear is the presence at the Isle of Wight of both sides. In his biography, Buttons talks about going to the island with trouble planned, and there were clashes between the different factions throughout the festival.

The connection between the bikers and festivals is long and not always straightforward, from the Rolling Stones using the British clubs as security for their Hyde Park gig in 1969, followed by the mess that was Altamont later in that year, continuing on to the Stonehenge Free Festival of the late seventies and early eighties.

At the Isle of Wight, the organisers were using a security firm, rather than bikers. Finding themselves outside, the bikers teamed up with the White Panthers and some Young Liberals to attack the fence. This resulted in an all out battle with the security guards, the latter using iron bars. Following the rising atmosphere of violence, the security patrols employed by the organisers were replaced by regular police.

There are obvious parallels between the festival in The Bikers and the Isle of Wight, but two things make it really clear this was the inspiration, and probably based on the account in Buttons book.

Firstly, in the chapter of his biography on the Isle of Wight festival, Buttons says,

“I knew that if serious trouble happened we could drop our patches and duck into the crowds until the advantage was back with us. I was prepared to stand and fight – but on our own terms. Not theirs.” (pg 139 Buttons: The Making of a President).

The second is the incident around the camp of the none All England Hells Angels (Buttons doesn’t call them amalgamation in his account, and other sources just call them Hells Angels.)

This is a report of what happened, according to the Underground Press.

“At 7pm on Saturday, 60 police surrounded the Angel’s camp, and in a one-to-one confrontation ordered them to play it cool. One of the catering staff had complained that an Angel went into the women’s loos and the police asked them to remove the swastika [flag]. Angel’s leader Buttons, would only agree if the police requested everyone else at the festival to remove their flags. The police retracted their demands and left the Angels alone for the rest of the festival.”

There is no doubt in my mind that Stuart took direct inspiration from these events for The Bikers, but where it goes next is very, very different.

On the Edge of Collapse

In much of his writing, Stuart gives a sense of a world in the same place as Mad Max (the first film), a feeling of a pre-apocalyptic country.

“Above the grounds are parched trees and inconsequential scrub and patches of heath severely diminished by the encroachment of artificially fertilised ploughlands.”

“The countryside beyond the Festival grounds seems peaceful, much as it always has done, save for its strangely colourless look, but it is doomed already. The organic content of the soil in the valley has fallen below the safe 8 per cent minimum, it has been exploited too quickly.”

This is a world that is dying, and the chaos of the festival isn’t even a symptom.

In contrast to the rest of the Apostles, Little Billy rides straight in, barely paying attention to the security he hits with his bike, or his two pillions getting grabbed from the pillion seat.

The Forces of Law and Order

And this is where we meet Chief Inspector Molt, the representative of authority inside the festival. When we first meet Molt, described as “Little Billy’s old friend, and moral benefactor“, he is in the process of telling them to take down their swastika flag, echoing the real events at the Isle of Wight festival. Here, Stuart explains the symbiotic relationship between the police and groups deemed to be on the outside of society.

Molt, who is tall and hard with a sharp nose dominating a face obviously designed as a meat cleaver, hates the Angels. It is his career to hate the Angels. They have made his reputation. They give him a reason for living. If he ever succeeds in destroying them, he’ll be destroying himself.

This truth is not just limited to bikers and the police, and becomes a lot more stark when police have to justify certain budgets.

While Molt does have a force of constables with him, they are not used to the conditions they have to work under in the festival, while the bikers are completely at home, and Stuart gives a really good sense of the Police losing control of the situation. There’s a great line where Stuart explains that Molt can understand the bikers, and can understand himself, but the crowd that surrounds them is an unknowable and ungovernable force. He can manage the bikers, but the mass of people who surround him? Not so much.

This section also contains one of my favourite descriptions, which is so evocative for anyone who has attended a big festival.

Coke cans crunch beneath police boots, the ground is strewn with newspapers and abandoned programmes; fruit peel and empty Embassy packets the cardboard shredded for the manufacture of roaches.

And the tension increases. This is definitely where Stuart excels, both in terms of the tension between Little Billy and Larry the Lamb, and the wider festival. At one point he describes the festival as a fortress of people, then focusses in on details like a guard dog getting killed and falling on a couple in a sleeping bag, with the crowd rising in number from 180,000 on one page to 200,000 on the next.

He also uses the shorthand of other festivals that ended in disaster.

Lots of people are making uneasy private references to Altamont, and astrologer freaks checking up the dates come to the conclusion that it’s one helluva bad weekend to bring so many people together because the vibes are very negative.

While this was written in the seventies, long before the real disenchantment of people in the eighties and early nineties under Thatcher, he talks about thousands of students starting out straight and finding there is no place for them in the world of work.

Woven all the way through the narrative is the sense of the day getting hotter. Whether that is intended as a metaphor for the heating up of tensions is unclear, but having been at very hot festivals (Glastonbury 1995, for example), Stuart continues to capture this. A sense of heat is woven through a lot of the language, for example,

A burning harvest does not direct its own flames – That’s for the wind to do.

And Stuart perfectly captures the way this hysteria can be whipped up, many years before the idea of social media manifested. One interesting detail here is the mention of Citizen Action Committees “declaring their intention of defending Society against these marauders.”

Again, with a story that repeats itself throughout the world, where there is a moral panic, there is a politician waiting to exploit the situation for his own ambitious gain.

Sir Frank Rutledge is described as hungry and ambitious, a Conservative MP with a background in a North-East stricken by unemployment. Rutledge is portrayed as knowing how to lever the press, even to the point where he embarrasses his PM. When the reports of what happened with the Apostles in London reach him, he knows he has the cause he can lever to generate publicity and momentum to help him to achieve his very self-serving goals. he describes the bikers as the enemies.

They can have no claim upon our mercy and our compassion. The Permissive Society has dealt compassionately with their kind for too long. The army must send in units after them immediately. If necessary it must be given the power to deal with them on the spot. They cannot expect the justice they deny others.

It’s telling how this language presaged almost exactly the language used for New age Travellers and the Convoy in the 1980s by the Conservative government in general and Thatcher in particular.

What’s really interesting in this section of the book, is how insightful Little Billy is portrayed as a leader. Rutledge thinks they will not only smash the bikers easily, he also thinks the crowd will turn against them. He realises if they went after the bikers at that moment, the bikers would be outnumbered and easily dealt with, but if the army is sent in, then the rest of the festival goers aren’t going to take it lying down.

Linda

By this point in the story, Linda and Little Billy have been reunited. As Larry the Lamb has been forced to surrender his temporary hold on the presidency of the club, he’s also been forced to surrender his relationship with Linda, which Linda didn’t seem to have much say in – the book apparently portraying her relationship as part of the role. It’s worth pointing out here, that these are pulp books and though some have more nuanced portrayals of roles of women in subcultures (see the Mick Norman books), they aren’t always very advanced in the way women are shown. However, it has to be said Linda is with Little Billy out of choice rather than obligation, and it may be her arrangement with Larry is more about maintaining status.

It is around this time in the story when Linda drops a trip, and goes on her own journey which crosses and intersects with the main storyline, but has its own trajectory.

Drugs have a long history with the various subcultures in the sixties and seventies, as well as into the decades that came after, and acid in particular has a certain folkloric place in the festival subculture, particularly following the announcements at Woodstock.

In such an environment the trip does not go well for Linda. The festival is a pressure cooker, and Linda feels like the epicentre of the chaos and stress. The manifestation of the paranoia that is building throughout the festival.

But for Linda whose mind is skyhighing, dizzily, on acid the universe is not as beautiful. She inhabits a confused world where rumours are as irresistible as the plague, in which everything is directed at her personally. She’s wandered from the Angels’ tent, suddenly conscious that at any moment the hordes of uniformed gas-masked monsters from some other world might descend to rape and torture her. And now she drifts from point to point of the massive crowd, through the setting sun.

Linda does not have a good time., with even the sky looking sick, and soon finds herself on stage.

The stage at any festival can become a focus for conflict and contested space, because whoever controls the stage controls the narrative. This can be seen at Altamont in particular, and I think this, rather than Isle of Wight, was probably the inspiration. At Altamont the stage is crowded, contested, seeing both occupation by people who are wasted as well as the bands, and the bikers who are moving in between the musicians. In this clip after Marty Balin gets knocked out, one of the bikers takes to the mic.

In The Bikers, Linda finds herself on stage and grabs the mic, shouting, “THE ARMY’S COMING IN WITH TANKS AND GUNS AND THEY’RE JUST USING THE ANGELS AS AN EXCUSE TO SCREW US ALL! WHOSE SIDE ARE YOU ON?

Again, we see how the stage is used to try and affect the mood of the crowd, when Miles the compere tries to blow the word “Peaceful”, to the crowd who aren’t exactly receptive, something that again echoes Altamont.

There are also echoes of the announcements at the Isle of Wight when one of the organisers started ranting from the stage at the audience.

The Army

The big difference between these festivals and the one in The Bikers is the presence of the army.

The use of the military in the British Isles was very much in the news at the time, because of the conflict in Northern Ireland. In 1969 British forces had been deployed in Ireland as part of Operation Banner, following riots that had seen ten people killed, including a 9 year old boy, with 745 injured. The army would have a presence in the six counties until 2007 as part of Operation Banner.

However, in 1971 the use of British forces in British domestic settings, and particularly against people the government decided were enemies of the state, was very much in the forefront of the national debate. It’s no surprise that one of the main elements of The Bikers is the use of the military.

Stuart makes explicit this link between the deployment in the book and the situation playing out on the streets of North Ireland, when the police withdraw, to coordinate the next stage of their operation with the ex-Ulster Infantry Companies.

One of the elements that they bring from the streets of Ulster is the use of less than lethal rounds. It’s no secret that the British government had developed rubber bullets for use in crowd control situations. It’s also no secret that these could be just as devastating. https://rubberbullets.longlead.com/chapter/rubber-bullet-history-northern-ireland. The weapon Stuart mentions is the discussed here at the Royal Armouries site, which was designed to take a number of different rounds, with its main ammunition the stun bags. I can’t find a reference that these exact weapons were used in Ulster, but it is possible.

However, the army was not deployed against civilians on the British Mainland in the seventies, and while that didn’t change in the 1980s, the increasingly militarisation of the police under Thatcher, seems to have been predicted by Stuart in The Bikers (along with a number of other writers such as mick Norman). this was particularly visible during the Miner’s Strike, such as at Orgreave, and during the Battle of the Beanfield.

The atmosphere of the time is very well summed in the song 1984 by New Model Army

It’s also worth noting that there have long been rumours that the military were used at the Beanfield, disguised as police in blue boilersuits with no numbers on their uniforms.

In the world created by Alex Stuart, the military are embarrassed by the position they are put in by the politicians to become involved in domestic disputes, a situation that is tense, putting battle ready men, some almost certainly dealing with PTSD, against kids.

And the incredible singer of Miraculous Dimensions, she opens wide and screams out over the fences into the startled ears of the instantly alert soldiers out of Ulster who by now are very fast on the riot trigger…into the headphones of the Royal Armoured Corps boys, who’ve dropped into the party with three Saladin Mark 2 Armoured Cars, among other armoured forms of transport.

In The Bikers, there is a real contrast between the measured writing depicting the Police/army discussions and the chaos of the festival in earlier scenes.

Then the dawn comes.

The weather again is used by Stuart to warn of what is coming, with its bloody red striations. Throughout the last part of the book, the rising temperature echoes the rising tension, which may seem obvious and trite but is incredibly well written, almost poetic in places. Fires burn, and the music has carried on throughout the night, but rather than create division between the bikers and the crowd, the presence of the army and police has galvanised the cohesion.

Sex in the Dirt

Sex scenes in New English Library books are there to titillate, and shock, and for that reason they can often grate to a modern audience. It’s interesting though, that the sex that is shown between Little Billy and Linda is portrayed as loving and affectionate, and the scene where a ‘starlet’ who has been abandoned by her producer escort, turns to the bikers for her sexual fantasies is shown as consensual, when assault was often used by other authors to provoke a reaction. Rather than using assault as the shock value (which does appear in a lot of the NEL books), the shock comes from her being a willing participant.

Resolved

Although the drama widens out, the central conflict is still between Larry and Little Billy, and throughout they have circled each other through the festival, with Little Billy trying to find his rival, while Larry stays out of the way and attempts to take out the stronger fighter without confronting him directly.

And the fight is a bit of a disappointment. Or not really. What I mean by that, is by modern dramatic standards there is no real tension, because Larry the Lamb is wildly outclassed as a fighter by Little Billy, and even when he draws a knife this is no contest.

If the fight was written now, there is a good chance, at some point, that Larry the Lamb would have got the upper hand, maybe leading us to think Little Billy had lost. Not here. Larry the Lamb is lost, probably from the start of the book, but when he starts playing for time, Little Billy takes off his shades (something he never does, and that is a cliché), then tears his prosthetic claws through Larry’s wrist to leave him bleeding out of a severed artery (on a pile of Jerry Cornelius and Fabulous Furry Freak Brothers).

The confrontation between Little Billy and Larry the Lamb is only one of a pair that needs to be resolved before the end of the book, and even when the leadership of the Apostles is settled, the army are still waiting outside, Rutledge is still looking at how he can lever the incident to progress his political career, and Inspector Molt is continuingly annoyed to be surrounded by idiots.

The Media

The media in The Bikers is not portrayed in a good light. While the freelance journalist Dan Lewin is a more radical writer, placing his work with underground magazines, there is no doubt who the public broadcasters and journalists are working for. This is clear at the start of Chapter 12, when a slight trickle of people (2000 out of a total of over 200,000) leaving the festival are intercepted by TV crews. While the interviewer asks leading questions.

“Did you see the Hell’s Angels attack people? Did they attack you? Isn’t it disgusting? The sympathy of the people of Britain is with you, my dear. thank you so much for speaking to us!”

It’s made very clear that the narrative will be controlled.

“Not all the interviews however are such smoothly-conducted exercises in the art of indoctrination through the media. But those which aren’t are not, of course, exposed to the curious and embarrassing gaze of the masses later.”

Again, this predicts a situation that became very prevalent under Thatcher, particularly around the Battle of the Beanfield and Orgreave. At both, footage shown on the news was switched to make it look like the police were reacting to aggressors, rather than instigating the violence. It’s worth watching the account of The Battle of the Beanfield by Nick Davies who was travelling with the Convoy at the time.

In this interview with ITN journalist Kim Sabido, he talks about how ITN at the time self-edited the report on the Beanfield. You can contrast the footage filmed by Sabido and his camera crew with what actually went out.

The Conclusion

Linda continues to be an observer, high on acid and seeing the patterns in the world, the way the storm above and the storm below will break. Even though she is watching while tripping, she has a clarity, seeing the stage as an embryo where the trouble will be born. A place where the more violent elements of the crowd are gathering for what is coming. The rest are just trees in the jungle, for the army to move through. Siddhartha are still playing, despite the risk to life and limb from electrocution, while outside Major Trenchard points out that many of the festival goers are from “good, propertied families. And they’ll raise hell if anything happens to their errant drug-taking children!”

Galtby, his subordinate, agrees, expressing his surprise. “I suppose it is astonishing how far people will go against the national interest to protect their children!”

Trenchard’s reason for his concern becomes clear in the aftermath. But first, the army enters.

Linda is still watching from the hill, and can see the soldiers gathered, described as gasmasked infantrymen from an H.P. Lovecraft nightmare. And that final confrontation is chaos, with soldiers fighting through the resisting crowd, with the weather against them, and the bikers fighting back. Behind the stage, a special force moves into place, trying to take out the band, and everything falls into close-quartered urgency, with the troops out in the crowd unable to be effective because of the press of people and the inability to identify the real dangers, like Little Billy who uses his claws very effectively in such an environment.

Eventually, with the storm still coming down, the music stops, the violence subsides. In the aftermath, Little Billy makes it out to meet Linda, while Major Trenchard’s wayward son lies in the mud, one of the causalities, of a police and military operation that is a complete failure, even when it succeeded.

Is The Bikers a good book? It’s an amazing read, and one of those gems of pulp fiction that comes along very rarely. It’s atmospheric, lyrical, and in many ways, prescient for what came in the eighties. Little Billy is a great anti-hero, and, for me, far more interesting than many in the New English Library youth subculture books. The story itself is well written, and the atmosphere, from the ever present weather to the press of the crowds in the festival, is beautifully captured. Moments like when the Apostles arrive at The Green Man, are incredibly evocative, to the point you can almost hear the radio and taste the road dust as it bakes in the summer sun.

It does a good job at looking back at recent history (the Isle of Wight Festival), and forward toward the social dystopia that was Britain under Thatcher, particularly the way the police were used against groups that were deigned by the authorities to have put themselves outside polite society, whether that was by choosing an alternative lifestyle or invoking their right to withdraw labour in protest.

Very much of its time, but a hell of a read.

If you’ve made it this far, thank you. I really appreciate you taking the time to read my ramblings!

Project Repoman 14 – The Fly (1958)

The video introduction below is incomplete, so I’ll also post the transcript.

Made in 1958, The Fly stars Vincent Price, who’s a very, very good actor. He’s been in a great many films, almost always horror films, and notably as the star of the whole of Roger Corman’s Edgar Allen Poe series.
The Fly is part science fiction and part horror. It’s one of a whole sub-genre of science-fiction films that were made in the 1950s in the aftermath of the atomic bomb. The theme of these films is pretty constant: science going wrong. They’re the sorts of movies where, early on, a scientist will say, ‘Humanity need never want nor fear again’ and, immediately after that, unleashes a huge monster. In the United States, films such as Them!, The Incredible Shrinking Man and Forbidden Planet all skirted around the same theme. In Japan, they made the huge series of Godzilla movies, which continues to this day. Over here, around about the same time, we were doing the Quatermass TV series and, later, the Quatermass films.
The Fly was remade recently by David Cronenberg, with lots of Hollywood production values, a very big budget and very, very graphic and grisly special effects. Although the middle section of the original movie is rather boring, I don’t think anything in the Cronenberg film compares with the truly bizarre climax of the 1958 version.

As I mentioned last week, we have a pair of films where I’ve seen the remake, but not so familiar with the original. This is the second. My first surprise when watching this, was that it was in colour. The DVD I was using has a very lurid cover, but I hadn’t realised the film itself was in ‘TERROR COLOR’. This was used to very good effect straight from the, very gory, opening scene. In fact, I hadn’t realised how graphic that first scene was, where the industrial press is discovered with blood down the side, and the implication of what has happened on full view.

I also hadn’t realised Vincent Price was in this, playing François, the brother of scientist André Delambre. Suave, with poise and presence, Price nevertheless feels slightly awkward, and a much bigger physical presence than I expected, but playing the brother in love with his sister-in-law pefectly.

I won’t go into too many comparisons with the remake, as that was shown later on in Moviedrome, but there is a lot less body horror than in Cronenberg’s remake, and to a modern audience the costume elements probably don’t have the impact they once did.

Set in Montreal, this is a very upper class vision of society, with maids, and the ability to ring police inspector Charas at his club where François is also a member. However, the details of the lab, and the willingness to cross social boundaries (like using the family cat to experiment on), echo back to Frankenstein, and the hubris does eventually bounce back on André.

Like Invasion of the Body Snatchers, The Fly uses a framing device of the flashback to tell the story after Hélène has killed André. Of course this is used to doubt Hélène’s sanity, until the encounter with the human-headed fly in the web.

While the fly/man hybrid is maybe a bit too costume monster for audiences used to CGI, the mannerisms are unsettling, and the barely controlled violence palatable. Also the man/fly hybrid is far more unsettling, and the actions of Charras in killing it are unnerving, possibly echoing a theme that runs throughout about how we treat nature. (As well as the cat, André also uses a guinea pig as a, well, guinea pig.). There are definite questions posed by the film about which holds André’s humanity, whether that is split between both, especially as André tells Hélène he is losing the fight against the fly’s consciousness in his body.

One little detail that might easily get missed, is near the beginning. When the nightwatchman hears the hydraulic press, he is standing beside a machine labelled with the word ‘SPIDER’.

A film that is very much of its time, and is probably a little in the shadow of the remake, but one that definitely brings up a lot of questions (like a lot of sci-fi horror of the time), about the limits and checks that should be in place on science.